SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Can radiative forcing be limited to 2.6 Wm−2 without negative emissions from bioenergy AND CO2 capture and storage?
12 references·1 citing·33 second hop
Can radiative forcing be limited to 2.6 Wm−2 without negative emissions from bioenergy AND CO2 capture and storage? (2013)Can radiative forcing be limited to 2.6 W…RCP4.5: a pathway for stabilization of radiative forcing by 2100 (2011)RCP4.5: a pathway for stabili…RCP 8.5—A scenario of comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions (2011)RCP 8.5—A scenario of compara…An emission pathway for stabilization at 6 Wm−2 radiative forcing (2011)An emission pathway for stabi…A special issue on the RCPs (2011)A special issue on the RCPsThe feasibility of low CO2 concentration targets and the role of bio-energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) (2010)The feasibility of low CO2 co…Climate mitigation and the future of tropical landscapes (2010)Climate mitigation and the fu…International climate policy architectures: Overview of the EMF 22 International Scenarios (2009)International climate policy …Implications of Limiting CO 2 Concentrations for Land Use and Energy (2009)Implications of Limiting CO 2…2.6: Limiting climate change to 450 ppm CO2 equivalent in the 21st century (2009)2.6: Limiting climate change …Stabilizing CO2concentrations with incomplete international cooperation (2008)Stabilizing CO2concentrations…Stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations at low levels: an assessment of reduction strategies and costs (2007)Stabilizing greenhouse gas co…The Economics of Exhaustible Resources (1931)The Economics of Exhaustible …Using forests for climate mitigation: sequester carbon or produce woody biomass? (2017)Using forests for climate mit…Special report on emissions scenarios (2000)Spatially explicit global population scenarios consistent with the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (2016)Emissions – the ‘business as usual’ story is misleading (2020)RCP8.5 tracks cumulative CO 2 emissions (2020)Human Development Report 2002 (2002)Towards New Scenarios for Analysis of Emissions, Climate Change, Impacts, and Response Strategies (2008)The impacts of China’s household consumption expenditure patterns on energy demand and carbon emissions towards 2050 (2012)Achieving Copenhagen target through carbon emission trading: Economic impacts assessment in Guangdong Province of China (2014)RCP2.6: exploring the possibility to keep global mean temperature increase below 2°C (2011)The dynamics of technology diffusion and the impacts of climate policy instruments in the decarbonisation of the global electricity sector (2014)The limits to global‐warming mitigation by terrestrial carbon removal (2017)Implications of climate change for shipping: Opening the Arctic seas (2018)Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies (2004)Fixing a Critical Climate Accounting Error (2009)Less than 2 °C warming by 2100 unlikely (2017)Residual fossil CO2 emissions in 1.5–2 °C pathways (2018)Scenarios of long-term socio-economic and environmental development under climate stabilization (2006)Bioenergy in energy transformation and climate management (2013)Economic mitigation challenges: how further delay closes the door for achieving climate targets (2013)Differences between carbon budget estimates unravelled (2016)Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 °C (2009)Estimates of the Social Cost of Carbon: Concepts and Results from the DICE-2013R Model and Alternative Approaches (2014)Some Contributions of Integrated Assessment Models of Global Climate Change (2017)A new scenario logic for the Paris Agreement long-term temperature goal (2019)Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrations (1996)Alternative pathways to the 1.5 °C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies (2018)A new scenario framework for Climate Change Research: scenario matrix architecture (2013)Amplification of future energy demand growth due to climate change (2019)Estimating the social cost of non-CO2 GHG emissions: Methane and nitrous oxide (2012)Assessment of climate change adaptation costs for the U.S. road network (2013)The value of bioenergy in low stabilization scenarios: an assessment using REMIND-MAgPIE (2013)Balanced-budget redistribution as the outcome of political competition (1987)Understanding Crude Oil Prices (2008)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1931The Economics of Exhaustible Resources4,535 cited
  • 2011RCP 8.5—A scenario of comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions2,793 cited
  • 2011RCP4.5: a pathway for stabilization of radiative forcing by 21001,634 cited
  • 2009Implications of Limiting CO 2 Concentrations for Land Use and Energy876 cited
  • 2007Stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations at low levels: an assessment of reduction strategies and costs742 cited
  • 2009International climate policy architectures: Overview of the EMF 22 International Scenarios521 cited
  • 2011An emission pathway for stabilization at 6 Wm−2 radiative forcing298 cited
  • 2010The feasibility of low CO2 concentration targets and the role of bio-energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)294 cited
  • 2011A special issue on the RCPs244 cited
  • 20092.6: Limiting climate change to 450 ppm CO2 equivalent in the 21st century130 cited
  • 2010Climate mitigation and the future of tropical landscapes87 cited
  • 2008Stabilizing CO2concentrations with incomplete international cooperation82 cited

Cited by

  • 2017Using forests for climate mitigation: sequester carbon or produce woody biomass?67 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work