Byzantine ‘Nationalism’ and the Nicaean Empire

Michael Angold

90 citations0/0 files storedByzantine and Modern Greek Studies

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Byzantine Studies and History Renaissance and Early Modern Studies Medieval History and Crusades

Abstract

The fall of Constantinople on the night of 13 April 1204 to the Venetians and the soldiers of the fourth crusade is taken as the crucial turning point of the history of the later Byzantine Empire. For many the final period of Byzantine history is nothing but the pathetic survival of a state built on the memories of its former greatness. This is in many ways far too gloomy a picture. Constantinople was to be recovered by the Byzantines in 1261; and we should not forget that the last centuries of Byzantium saw a flowering of Byzantine art and scholarship. This achievement naturally directs our attention to the period of exile, when the foundations of this ‘Last Byzantine Renaissance’, as it has been called, were laid. In exile the Byzantine Empire was re-established and the Byzantine heritage preserved, at a time when both appeared to be in danger of being recreated in a Latin image, for a Latin emperor and a Latin patriarch had been established in Constantinople in place of the Byzantine emperor and the Byzantine patriarch. The fall of Constantinople, indeed, produced a feeling of fatalism and despondency among the Byzantines. There was a tendency to accept the Latin conquest. The peasantry of Thrace even took pleasure in the discomfiture of the Byzantine aristocrats and intellectuals of Constantinople. Some Byzantine magnates attempted to organize resistance to the Latin conquest, but even this, at least in the aftermath of the fall of Constantinople, was probably done in the hope of securing a favourable bargaining position with the Latins. One of the great Byzantine magnates of Thrace, the Caesar Theodore Vranas, entered the ranks of the Latin aristocracy. Even Michael Angelos, the founder of what we have come to know as the Despotate of Epiros, was willing to submit for a short while to the authority of the Latin emperor.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 90 citations exist upstream.

References

1958History of the Byzantine State 1972The Byzantine Commonwealth: Eastern Europe, 500-1453 1963Antique Statuary and the Byzantine Beholder 1974Constantine Porphyrogenitus and His World 1975A Byzantine Government in Exile: Government and Society under the Laskarids of Nicaea (1204–1261)1970The Last Byzantine Renaissance 2018A Byzantine Commonwealth, 476–553 2012Acta et Diplomata Graeca Medii Aevi Sacra et Profana

Cited by

2011The Necessary Nation 2009Equilibrium to Expansion (886–1025)2009Armenian Neighbours (600–1045)2009State of Emergency (700–850)2003Re-inventing the Homeland in the Historiography of Frankish Greece: The Fourth Crusade and the Legend of the Trojan War 2009Byzantium Transforming (600–700)2019The Cambridge History of the Byzantine Empire c.500–1492

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.