The (Post)Colonial Predicament of Native American Studies

Abstract

For reasons having to do with both literary and political theory, post-colonial studies have largely ignored Native American issues in the United States, while at the same time Native American studies have remained ambivalent as to their potential position within a more inclusive, or aware, postcolonial studies. In this essay I argue that the indispensable and yet to date unexamined context for situating Native American literatures of the US within a (post)colonial context is federal Indian law, which perpetuates an ongoing colonialism for the 330 Indian tribes in the lower forty-eight states that come completely under its governance. Among its possible effects, I understand this context as potentially mediating current debates between Native Americanists from the nationalist and cosmopolitan schools of Native studies, though I use mediating here in its theoretical not its political sense, for I doubt these intensely conflictive positions will be reconciled nor do I necessarily have any interest in such reconciliation. My interest, rather, is in making a compelling case for the necessity of deploying federal Indian law in understanding Native literatures of the US. In order to exemplify this necessity, I sketch a reading of Leslie Silko's Almanac of the Dead in the final part of this essay.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 61 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.