Impactitis: The impact factor myth syndrome

Mohamed Lotfy Elsaie · Jenna N. Kammer

30 citations0/0 files storedIndian Journal of Dermatology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Academic Writing and Publishing Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the early 1960s, Eugene Garfield and Irving Sher created the journal impact factor to help select journals for the Science Citation Index (SCI). Today it has become a widespread subject of controversy even for Garfield, the man who created it who is quoted saying "Impact Factor is not a perfect tool to measure the quality of articles but there is nothing better and it has the advantage of already being in existence and is, therefore, a good technique for scientific evaluation". The use of the term "impact factor" has gradually evolved, especially in Europe, to include both journal and author impact. This ambiguity often causes problems. It is one thing to use impact factors to compare journals and quite another to use them to compare authors. Journal impact factors generally involve relatively large populations of articles and citations. Individual authors, on average, produce much smaller numbers of articles. OBJECTIVES: Impact factor, an index based on the frequency with which a journal's articles are cited in scientific publications, is a putative marker of journal quality. However, empiric studies on impact factor's validity as an indicator of quality are lacking. The authors try to evaluate and highlight the validity of Impact Factors and its significance as a tool of assessment for scientific publications. METHODS: Analysis of the several reports in literature and from their own point of view. CONCLUSION: A journal's impact factor is based on 2 elements: the numerator, which is the number of citations in the current year to any items published in a journal in the previous 2 years, and the denominator, which is the number of substantive articles (source items) published in the same 2 years. The impact factor could just as easily be based on the previous year's articles alone, which would give an even greater weight to rapidly changing fields.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 30 citations exist upstream.

References

1972Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation 1994Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact 1996Impact factors can mislead 1992How representative is the journal impact factor?1995Journal impact factors

Cited by

2014Art of publication and selection of journal 2012A Review of the Journal of Investigative Dermatology's Most Cited Publications over the Past 25 Years and the Use of Developing Bibliometric Methodologies to Assess Journal Quality 2016A writer’s dilemma: Where to publish and where not to?2019A comparison of bibliometric indicators in occupational therapy journals published in English 2019Eugene Garfield’s Ideas and Legacy and Their Impact on the Culture of Research 2011The expansion of a measure: what is a scientific journal impact factor and how important is it for academic Brazilian dermatologists 2016Ocena ekspercka jako trzeci wymiar ewaluacji krajowych czasopism naukowych 2018A Critique of the Impact Factor and Ramifications of Its Misuse in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: The Real Impact of the Impact Factor

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.