SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Quality is in the eye of the beholder? An evaluation of impact factors and perception of journal prestige in the UK
14 references·4 citing·42 second hop
Quality is in the eye of the beholder? An evaluation of impact factors and perception of journal prestige in the UK (2009)Quality is in the eye of the beholder? An…Life and times of the impact factor: retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994-2005) and their Editors' views (2007)Life and times of the impact …Relative Citation Impact of Various Study Designs in the Health Sciences (2005)Relative Citation Impact of V…Journal Impact Factors and Self-Citations: Implications for Psychology Journals. (2004)Journal Impact Factors and Se…The meaning of the Impact Factor (2003)The meaning of the Impact Fac…The explosion of knowledge, references, and citations: Psychology's unique response to a crisis. (2003)The explosion of knowledge, r…Impact factors: arbiter of excellence? (2003)Impact factors: arbiter of ex…Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? (2003)Impact factor: a valid measur…Journal Prestige, Publication Bias, and Other Characteristics Associated With Citation of Published Studies in Peer-Reviewed Journals (2002)Journal Prestige, Publication…Journal impact factor: a brief review. (1999)Journal impact factor: a brie…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Why the impact factor of jour…Sense and nonsense about the impact factor (1997)Sense and nonsense about the …From bad to worse: evaluation by journal impact (1989)From bad to worse: evaluation…Citations and the evaluation of individual scientists (1989)Citations and the evaluation …The citation impact factor: Another dubious index of journal quality. (1982)The citation impact factor: A…Perceived quality and self‐identity in scholarly publishing (2019)Perceived quality and self‐id…Making sense of altmetrics: The perceived threats and opportunities for academic identity (2019)Making sense of altmetrics: T…Key questions in the development and use of survey-based journal rankings (2017)Key questions in the developm…Physical Education Pedagogy Faculty Perceptions of Journal Quality (2014)Physical Education Pedagogy F…A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Comparison of Evidence of Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies (2001)Registration in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) of systematic review protocols was associated with increased review quality (2018)Editorial: Review Articles, Systematic Reviews, Meta-Analysis, and the Updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 Guidelines (2021)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)Little Science, Big Science...and Beyond (1986)What Happens to Our Ideas? (2005)In Search of Cultural Diversity, Revisited: Recent Publication Trends in Cross-Cultural and Ethnic Minority Psychology (2013)Self-citations, a trend prevalent across subject disciplines at the global level: an overview (2017)Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy (1959)Science in Action (1987)Citation analysis for measuring the value of scientific publications: quality assessment tool or comedy of errors? (1996)Citation analysis and journal impact factors in ophthalmology and vision science journals (2003)Impact factors of forensic science and toxicology journals: what do the numbers really mean? (2003)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2017)Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research (2000)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Dealing with heterogeneity of treatment effects: is the literature up to the challenge? (2009)Integrative Approach to Quality Assessment of Medical Journals Using Impact Factor, Eigenfactor, and Article Influence Scores (2010)Bibliometric Indicators for Evaluating the Quality of Scientific Publications (2014)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers (1990)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Comparative study of international academic rankings of universities (2007)Garfield and the impact factor (2007)A bibliometric classificatory approach for the study and assessment of research performance at the individual level: The effects of age on productivity and impact (2010)Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor (2008)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics (2018)Citations and journal impact factors: questionable indicators of research quality (1997)Association of Journal Quality Indicators With Methodological Quality of Clinical Research Articles (2002)The Assessment of Science: The Relative Merits of Post-Publication Review, the Impact Factor, and the Number of Citations (2013)A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures (2009)Application of bibliometrics in medicine: a historical bibliometrics analysis (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,444 cited
  • 1999Journal impact factor: a brief review.760 cited
  • 2002Journal Prestige, Publication Bias, and Other Characteristics Associated With Citation of Published Studies in Peer-Reviewed Journals643 cited
  • 2003Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality?584 cited
  • 2005Relative Citation Impact of Various Study Designs in the Health Sciences497 cited
  • 1997Sense and nonsense about the impact factor286 cited
  • 2003The meaning of the Impact Factor185 cited
  • 2007Life and times of the impact factor: retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994-2005) and their Editors' views164 cited
  • 1989Citations and the evaluation of individual scientists101 cited
  • 2003The explosion of knowledge, references, and citations: Psychology's unique response to a crisis.90 cited
  • 2004Journal Impact Factors and Self-Citations: Implications for Psychology Journals.56 cited
  • 1989From bad to worse: evaluation by journal impact56 cited
  • 2003Impact factors: arbiter of excellence?50 cited
  • 1982The citation impact factor: Another dubious index of journal quality.41 cited

Cited by

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2019
Making sense of altmetrics: The perceived threats and opportunities for academic identity
15 cited
  • 2017Key questions in the development and use of survey-based journal rankings14 cited
  • 2019Perceived quality and self‐identity in scholarly publishing13 cited
  • 2014Physical Education Pedagogy Faculty Perceptions of Journal Quality13 cited