SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Again, and Again, and Again …
0 references·16 citing·45 second hopsampled
Again, and Again, and Again … (2011)Again, and Again, and Again …The anatomy of an award-winning meta-analysis: Recommendations for authors, reviewers, and readers of meta-analytic reviews (2021)The anatomy of an award-winni…Reproducible Research and GIScience: An Evaluation Using GIScience Conference Papers (2018)Reproducible Research and GIS…Reproducibility in Scientific Computing (2018)Reproducibility in Scientific…Replication studies in economics—How many and which papers are chosen for replication, and why? (2018)Replication studies in econom…Replication in Second Language Research: Narrative and Systematic Reviews and Recommendations for the Field (2018)Replication in Second Languag…Addressing the “Replication Crisis”: Using Original Studies to Design Replication Studies with Appropriate Statistical Power (2017)Addressing the “Replication C…Top 10 Replicated Findings From Behavioral Genetics (2016)Top 10 Replicated Findings Fr…Replication Research and Special Education (2016)Replication Research and Spec…Recommendations for Replication Research in Special Education (2016)Recommendations for Replicati…Replication and robustness in developmental research. (2014)Replication and robustness in…Facts Are More Important Than Novelty (2014)Facts Are More Important Than…Big data and its epistemology (2014)Big data and its epistemologyThe Replication Recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? (2013)The Replication Recipe: What …How Trustworthy Is the Scientific Literature in Industrial and Organizational Psychology? (2013)How Trustworthy Is the Scient…Replications in Psychology Research (2012)Replications in Psychology Re…An Open, Large-Scale, Collaborative Effort to Estimate the Reproducibility of Psychological Science (2012)An Open, Large-Scale, Collabo…The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The Logic of Scientific Discovery (2013)Investigating Variation in Replicability (2014)The Empirical Status of Mindfulness-Based Interventions: A Systematic Review of 44 Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (2021)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Registered Reports (2014)The unity and diversity of executive functions: A systematic review and re-analysis of latent variable studies. (2018)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)School readiness and later achievement. (2007)Gaining insights from social media language: Methodologies and challenges. (2016)Cognitive and noncognitive predictors of success (2019)Recommendations for Increasing the Transparency of Analysis of Preexisting Data Sets (2019)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Assessment rubrics: towards clearer and more replicable design, research and practice (2015)What One Hundred Years of Research Says About the Effects of Ability Grouping and Acceleration on K–12 Students’ Academic Achievement (2016)How School Leadership Influences Student Learning: A Test of “The Four Paths Model” (2019)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Microaggressions (2017)The p factor: genetic analyses support a general dimension of psychopathology in childhood and adolescence (2019)Leader development across the lifespan: A dynamic experiences-grounded approach (2020)Reproducible Research in Computational Science (2011)Promoting an open research culture (2015)Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results (2018)Computational Reproducibility via Containers in Psychology (2019)Practical Reproducibility in Geography and Geosciences (2020)Reproducible Research: A Retrospective (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Abusive supervision: A systematic review and fundamental rethink (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Transformational versus transactional leadership styles and project success: A meta-analytic review (2021)How to search for literature in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A comprehensive step-by-step guide (2024)A power primer. (1992)A power primer. (1992)G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences (2007)Social physics (2022)A methodological synthesis of self-paced reading in second language research (2018)A comprehensive review of Rasch measurement in language assessment: Recommendations and guidelines for research (2020)Coming of age: the past, present, and future of quantitative SLA research (2020)Sharing interoperable workflow provenance: A review of best practices and their practical application in CWLProv (2019)A taxonomy for reproducible and replicable research in environmental modelling (2020)The data science life cycle (2020)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2012Replications in Psychology Research750 cited
  • 2013The Replication Recipe: What makes for a convincing replication?706 cited
  • 2012An Open, Large-Scale, Collaborative Effort to Estimate the Reproducibility of Psychological Science614 cited
  • 2014Facts Are More Important Than Novelty609 cited
  • 2016Top 10 Replicated Findings From Behavioral Genetics516 cited
  • 2018Replication in Second Language Research: Narrative and Systematic Reviews and Recommendations for the Field269 cited
  • 2014Replication and robustness in developmental research.207 cited
  • 2018Reproducibility in Scientific Computing149 cited
  • 2021The anatomy of an award-winning meta-analysis: Recommendations for authors, reviewers, and readers of meta-analytic reviews141 cited
  • 2018Reproducible Research and GIScience: An Evaluation Using GIScience Conference Papers136 cited
  • 2014Big data and its epistemology134 cited
  • 2017Addressing the “Replication Crisis”: Using Original Studies to Design Replication Studies with Appropriate Statistical Power131 cited
  • 2013How Trustworthy Is the Scientific Literature in Industrial and Organizational Psychology?125 cited
  • 2018Replication studies in economics—How many and which papers are chosen for replication, and why?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

120 cited
  • 2016Replication Research and Special Education118 cited
  • 2016Recommendations for Replication Research in Special Education117 cited