SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Too good to be true: Publication bias in two prominent studies from experimental psychology
12 references·16 citing·41 second hop
Too good to be true: Publication bias in two prominent studies from experimental psychology (2012)Too good to be true: Publication bias in …Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: The case of psi: Comment on Bem (2011). (2011)Why psychologists must change…Unpublished results hide the decline effect (2011)Unpublished results hide the …Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect. (2011)Feeling the future: Experimen…False-Positive Psychology (2011)False-Positive PsychologyWhy Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (2008)Why Most Discovered True Asso…An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings (2007)An exploratory test for an ex…Publication and related bias in meta-analysis (2000)Publication and related bias …Publication Decisions Revisited: The Effect of the Outcome of Statistical Tests on the Decision to Publish and Vice Versa (1995)Publication Decisions Revisit…Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Operating Characteristics of …Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Statistical Methods for Meta-…Estimation of Effect Size under Nonrandom Sampling: The Effects of Censoring Studies Yielding Statistically Insignificant Mean Differences (1984)Estimation of Effect Size und…Publication Decisions and their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—or Vice Versa (1959)Publication Decisions and the…Robust Bayesian meta‐analysis: Model‐averaging across complementary publication bias adjustment methods (2022)Robust Bayesian meta‐analysis…The Teaching and Learning Toolkit (2018)The Teaching and Learning Too…The crisis of confidence in research findings in psychology: Is lack of replication the real problem? Or is it something else? (2016)The crisis of confidence in r…Underpowered samples, false negatives, and unconscious learning (2015)Underpowered samples, false n…Best research practices in psychology: Illustrating epistemological and pragmatic considerations with the case of relationship science. (2015)Best research practices in ps…A Large Scale Test of the Effect of Social Class on Prosocial Behavior (2015)A Large Scale Test of the Eff…The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating the Quality of Empirical Journals with Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power (2014)The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating…The frequency of excess success for articles in Psychological Science (2014)The frequency of excess succe…Let’s Put Our Money Where Our Mouth Is (2014)Let’s Put Our Money Where Our…US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research (2013)US studies may overestimate e…Research Practices That Can Prevent an Inflation of False-Positive Rates (2013)Research Practices That Can P…Priming Intelligent Behavior: An Elusive Phenomenon (2013)Priming Intelligent Behavior:…How Trustworthy Is the Scientific Literature in Industrial and Organizational Psychology? (2013)How Trustworthy Is the Scient…Clarifications on the application and interpretation of the test for excess significance and its extensions (2013)Clarifications on the applica…Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting (2012)Why Science Is Not Necessaril…Science or Art? How Aesthetic Standards Grease the Way Through the Publication Bottleneck but Undermine Science (2012)Science or Art? How Aesthetic…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed (2005)Comparison of Two Methods to Detect Publication Bias in Meta-analysis (2006)The global prevalence of common mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis 1980–2013 (2014)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Integration of evidence from multiple meta-analyses: a primer on umbrella reviews, treatment networks and multiple treatments meta-analyses (2009)Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature (2017)Long-term outcomes of childhood sexual abuse: an umbrella review (2019)Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. (1968)Belief in the law of small numbers. (1971)NEO inventories for the NEO Personality Inventory-3 (NEO-PI-3), NEO Five-Factor Inventory-3 (NEO-FFI-3), NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO PI-R) : professional manual (2010)Replication studies: Bad copy (2012)Consciousness in the universe: a review of the 'Orch OR' theory. (2014)Making replication mainstream (2017)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)How Big Is “Big”? Interpreting Effect Sizes in L2 Research (2014)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning (2017)Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling. (1983)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)The New Statistics (2013)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)A Short (Personal) Future History of Revolution 2.0 (2015)What’s in a p? Reassessing best practices for conducting and reporting hypothesis-testing research (2017)Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Anxiety and Depressive Disorders in Offspring of Parents With Anxiety Disorders (2018)HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known (1998)Replications in Psychology Research (2012)Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology (2013)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis. (1975)A meta-analytic review of prolonged exposure for posttraumatic stress disorder (2010)An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1994Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias16,951 cited
  • 1988Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis10,330 cited
  • 2011False-Positive Psychology6,561 cited
  • 2000Publication and related bias in meta-analysis2,283 cited
  • 2008Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated1,489 cited
  • 2011Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: The case of psi: Comment on Bem (2011).977 cited
  • 1959Publication Decisions and their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—or Vice Versa964 cited
  • 2011Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect.893 cited
  • 2007An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings751 cited
  • 1995Publication Decisions Revisited: The Effect of the Outcome of Statistical Tests on the Decision to Publish and Vice Versa453 cited
  • 2011Unpublished results hide the decline effect333 cited
  • 1984Estimation of Effect Size under Nonrandom Sampling: The Effects of Censoring Studies Yielding Statistically Insignificant Mean Differences241 cited

Cited by

  • 2012Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting563 cited
  • 2014The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating the Quality of Empirical Journals with Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

405 cited
  • 2012Science or Art? How Aesthetic Standards Grease the Way Through the Publication Bottleneck but Undermine Science274 cited
  • 2015Underpowered samples, false negatives, and unconscious learning260 cited
  • 2015A Large Scale Test of the Effect of Social Class on Prosocial Behavior255 cited
  • 2013Priming Intelligent Behavior: An Elusive Phenomenon242 cited
  • 2015Best research practices in psychology: Illustrating epistemological and pragmatic considerations with the case of relationship science.203 cited
  • 2014Let’s Put Our Money Where Our Mouth Is151 cited
  • 2013Clarifications on the application and interpretation of the test for excess significance and its extensions150 cited
  • 2016The crisis of confidence in research findings in psychology: Is lack of replication the real problem? Or is it something else?145 cited
  • 2022Robust Bayesian meta‐analysis: Model‐averaging across complementary publication bias adjustment methods145 cited
  • 2018The Teaching and Learning Toolkit136 cited
  • 2013US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research131 cited
  • 2013Research Practices That Can Prevent an Inflation of False-Positive Rates129 cited
  • 2014The frequency of excess success for articles in Psychological Science127 cited
  • 2013How Trustworthy Is the Scientific Literature in Industrial and Organizational Psychology?125 cited