SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Most meta-analyses of drug interventions have narrow scopes and many focus on specific agents
16 references·1 citing·51 second hop
Most meta-analyses of drug interventions have narrow scopes and many focus on specific agents (2013)Most meta-analyses of drug interventions …How to Use an Article Reporting a Multiple Treatment Comparison Meta-analysis (2012)How to Use an Article Reporti…Network meta-analysis-highly attractive but more methodological research is needed (2011)Network meta-analysis-highly …Characteristics of meta-analyses and their component studies in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: a cross-sectional, descriptive analysis (2011)Characteristics of meta-analy…Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial (2010)Graphical methods and numeric…Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Dissemination and publication…An international registry of systematic-review protocols (2010)An international registry of …Integration of evidence from multiple meta-analyses: a primer on umbrella reviews, treatment networks and multiple treatments meta-analyses (2009)Integration of evidence from …Reasons or excuses for avoiding meta-analysis in forest plots (2008)Reasons or excuses for avoidi…Exploring the Geometry of Treatment Networks (2008)Exploring the Geometry of Tre…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…A systematic review identified few methods and strategies describing when and how to update systematic reviews (2007)A systematic review identifie…Systematic reviews: when is an update an update? (2006)Systematic reviews: when is a…Relative Citation Impact of Various Study Designs in the Health Sciences (2005)Relative Citation Impact of V…Publishing Protocols of Systematic Reviews (2002)Publishing Protocols of Syste…Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons (2002)Network meta‐analysis for ind…Do systematic reviews on pediatric topics need special methodological considerations? (2017)Do systematic reviews on pedi…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis (2008)Predictive distributions for between‐study heterogeneity and simple methods for their application in Bayesian meta‐analysis (2014)A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery (2017)Music therapy for stress reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts (2013)In meta-analyses of proportion studies, funnel plots were found to be an inaccurate method of assessing publication bias (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense (2012)Systematic review automation technologies (2014)Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting (2018)The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Severe mental illness in 33 588 prisoners worldwide: systematic review and meta-regression analysis (2012)A meta-analysis of the prevalence of different functions of non-suicidal self-injury (2017)Empirical Comparison of Publication Bias Tests in Meta-Analysis (2018)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Comparison of Evidence of Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies (2001)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)Registration in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) of systematic review protocols was associated with increased review quality (2018)Editorial: Review Articles, Systematic Reviews, Meta-Analysis, and the Updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 Guidelines (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity (2017)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Demystifying trial networks and network meta-analysis (2013)Network meta-analysis: application and practice using Stata (2017)Ten simple rules for conducting umbrella reviews (2018)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Consistency and inconsistency in network meta‐analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta‐regression (2012)Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 2 (2012)Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis (2014)Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA (2013)Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods (2015)The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2010Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial3,764 cited
  • 2002Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons1,204 cited
  • 2010Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases1,039 cited
  • 2007Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews891 cited
  • 2009Integration of evidence from multiple meta-analyses: a primer on umbrella reviews, treatment networks and multiple treatments meta-analyses713 cited
  • 2010An international registry of systematic-review protocols513 cited
  • 2005Relative Citation Impact of Various Study Designs in the Health Sciences497 cited
  • 2008Reasons or excuses for avoiding meta-analysis in forest plots457 cited
  • 2011Characteristics of meta-analyses and their component studies in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: a cross-sectional, descriptive analysis403 cited
  • 2011Network meta-analysis-highly attractive but more methodological research is needed361 cited
  • 2012How to Use an Article Reporting a Multiple Treatment Comparison Meta-analysis360 cited
  • 2008Exploring the Geometry of Treatment Networks231 cited
  • 2002Publishing Protocols of Systematic Reviews

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

188 cited
  • 2006Systematic reviews: when is an update an update?110 cited
  • 2007A systematic review identified few methods and strategies describing when and how to update systematic reviews98 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2017Do systematic reviews on pediatric topics need special methodological considerations?20 cited