Internists’ Attitudes Toward Prevention of Firearm Injury

Renee Butkus · Arlene Weissman

54 citations0/0 files storedAnnals of Internal Medicine

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Gun Ownership and Violence Research Suicide and Self-Harm Studies Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Professional organizations have called for the medical community's attention to the prevention of firearm injury. However, little is known about physicians' attitudes and practices in preventing firearm injury. OBJECTIVE: To determine internists' attitudes and practices about firearms and to assess whether opinions differ according to whether there are gun owners in a physician's home. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Internal medicine practices. PARTICIPANTS: 573 internists representative of American College of Physicians' members. MEASURES: Respondents' experiences and reported practice behaviors related to firearms and their opinions about contributors and public policies related to firearm violence, as well as physician education and training in firearm safety. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 56.5%. Eighty-five percent of respondents believed that firearm injury is a public health issue, and 71% believed that it is a bigger problem today than a decade ago. Seventy-six percent of respondents believed that stricter gun control legislation would help reduce the risks for gun-related injuries or deaths. Although 66% of respondents believed that physicians should have the right to counsel patients on preventing deaths and injuries from firearms, 58% reported never asking whether patients have guns in their homes. LIMITATIONS: The generalizability of these findings to non-American College of Physicians' member internists and other physicians is unknown. Responses may not reflect actual behavior. CONCLUSION: Most respondents believed that firearm-related violence is a public health issue and favored policy initiatives aimed at reducing it. Although most internists supported a physician's right to counsel patients about gun safety, few reported currently doing it. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 54 citations exist upstream.

References

2005Deaths: preliminary data for 2003.2010Homicide, Suicide, and Unintentional Firearm Fatality: Comparing the United States With Other High-Income Countries, 2003 2003Improving Firearm Storage Habits: Impact of Brief Office Counseling by Family Physicians 2005Article 1998Internists' and Surgeons' Attitudes toward Guns and Firearm Injury Prevention

Cited by

2015Racial Disparities in Cranial Gunshot Wounds: Intent and Survival 2020Death and long-term disability after gun injury: a cohort analysis 2021Consensus-Driven Priorities for Firearm Injury Education Among Medical Professionals 2018Continuing Medical Education and Firearm Violence Counseling 2019An educational intervention for medical students to improve self-efficacy in firearm injury prevention counseling 2019California Public Opinion On Health Professionals Talking With Patients About Firearms 2019The Third Rail of Pediatric Communication: Discussing Firearm Risk and Safety in Well-Child Exams 2022The 5 A’s of firearm safety counseling: Validating a clinical counseling methodology for firearms in a simulation-based randomized controlled trial

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.