SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Assessment of Risk of Bias Among Pediatric Randomized Controlled Trials
9 references·16 citing·41 second hop
Assessment of Risk of Bias Among Pediatric Randomized Controlled Trials (2010)Assessment of Risk of Bias Among Pediatri…Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study (2009)Risk of bias versus quality a…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials (2007)Impact of allocation concealm…The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The History and Meaning of th…An absence of pediatric randomized controlled trials in general medical journals, 1985–2004 (2006)An absence of pediatric rando…The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)The Hazards of Scoring the Qu…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. D…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of BiasAssessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)Assessing the quality of rand…Quality of reporting inflammatory bowel disease randomised controlled trials: a systematic review (2024)Quality of reporting inflamma…Risk of bias assessment of randomised controlled trials referenced in the 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care: a cross-sectional review (2019)Risk of bias assessment of ra…Completeness of protocols for clinical trials in children submitted to ethics committees (2018)Completeness of protocols for…The Conduct and Reporting of Child Health Research: An Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in 2012 and Evaluation of Change over 5 Years (2017)The Conduct and Reporting of …Risk of bias assessment of randomised controlled trials in high-impact ophthalmology journals and general medical journals: a systematic review (2017)Risk of bias assessment of ra…Task-Specific Balance Training Improves the Sensory Organisation of Balance Control in Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder: A Randomised Controlled Trial (2016)Task-Specific Balance Trainin…Risk of bias of randomized trials over time (2015)Risk of bias of randomized tr…Recommendations and evidence for reporting items in pediatric clinical trial protocols and reports: two systematic reviews (2015)Recommendations and evidence …Risk of bias in randomised controlled trials of health behaviour change interventions: Evidence, practices and challenges (2014)Risk of bias in randomised co…Reducing the risk of bias in health behaviour change trials: Improving trial design, reporting or bias assessment criteria? A review and case study (2014)Reducing the risk of bias in …Education in Health Research Methodology: Use of a Wiki for Knowledge Translation (2013)Education in Health Research …Standard 2: Containing Risk of Bias (2012)Standard 2: Containing Risk o…Reporting of methods was better in the Clinical Trials Registry-India than in Indian journal publications (2012)Reporting of methods was bett…Risk of Bias Tool in Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analyses of Acupuncture in Chinese Journals (2011)Risk of Bias Tool in Systemat…Quality of Reporting of Neonatal and Infant Trials in High-Impact Journals (2011)Quality of Reporting of Neona…Characteristics and quality of reporting of cluster randomized trials in children: reporting needs improvement (2011)Characteristics and quality o…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed (2002)Best Care at Lower Cost (2013)Musculoskeletal neck pain in children and adolescents: Risk factors and complications (2017)Text Neck Syndrome in Children and Adolescents (2021)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation (2014)RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials (2015)Development of the Anatomical Quality Assessment (AQUA) Tool for the quality assessment of anatomical studies included in meta‐analyses and systematic reviews (2016)A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)More Informative Abstracts Revisited (1990)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management (2006)Sex Differences in Insomnia: A Meta-Analysis (2006)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields (2004)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (2013)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (2013)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Psychometric Properties of the Revised Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (2009)Efficacy of interventions to improve motor performance in children with developmental coordination disorder: a combined systematic review and meta‐analysis (2012)Systematic review and meta-analysis (2019)Physical Therapy Management of Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder: An Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline From the Academy of Pediatric Physical Therapy of the American Physical Therapy Association (2020)Studies on Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder in the Past 20 Years: A Bibliometric Analysis via CiteSpace (2021)Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials (2011)Effectiveness of Treatment Approaches for Children and Adolescents with Reading Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (2014)Association Between Risk-of-Bias Assessments and Results of Randomized Trials in Cochrane Reviews: The ROBES Meta-Epidemiologic Study (2017)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
  • 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
  • 2006The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor2,765 cited
  • 1999The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis1,981 cited
  • 1995Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists1,306 cited
  • 2007Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials470 cited
  • 2009Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study348 cited
  • 2006An absence of pediatric randomized controlled trials in general medical journals, 1985–2004110 cited

Cited by

  • 2016Task-Specific Balance Training Improves the Sensory Organisation of Balance Control in Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder: A Randomised Controlled Trial54 cited
  • 2014Reducing the risk of bias in health behaviour change trials: Improving trial design, reporting or bias assessment criteria? A review and case study53 cited
  • 2017The Conduct and Reporting of Child Health Research: An Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in 2012 and Evaluation of Change over 5 Years41 cited
  • 2015Recommendations and evidence for reporting items in pediatric clinical trial protocols and reports: two systematic reviews

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

40 cited
  • 2014Risk of bias in randomised controlled trials of health behaviour change interventions: Evidence, practices and challenges36 cited
  • 2015Risk of bias of randomized trials over time34 cited
  • 2011Characteristics and quality of reporting of cluster randomized trials in children: reporting needs improvement33 cited
  • 2011Quality of Reporting of Neonatal and Infant Trials in High-Impact Journals30 cited
  • 2012Reporting of methods was better in the Clinical Trials Registry-India than in Indian journal publications30 cited
  • 2012Standard 2: Containing Risk of Bias28 cited
  • 2019Risk of bias assessment of randomised controlled trials referenced in the 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care: a cross-sectional review24 cited
  • 2011Risk of Bias Tool in Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analyses of Acupuncture in Chinese Journals20 cited
  • 2017Risk of bias assessment of randomised controlled trials in high-impact ophthalmology journals and general medical journals: a systematic review18 cited
  • 2013Education in Health Research Methodology: Use of a Wiki for Knowledge Translation16 cited
  • 2024Quality of reporting inflammatory bowel disease randomised controlled trials: a systematic review13 cited
  • 2018Completeness of protocols for clinical trials in children submitted to ethics committees12 cited