SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Journal reviewing practices: Authors' and APA members' suggestions for revision.
0 references·16 citing·20 second hop
Journal reviewing practices: Authors' and APA members' suggestions for revision. (1970)Journal reviewing practices: Authors' and…How to review journal manuscripts: A lesson learnt from the world's excellent reviewers (2014)How to review journal manuscr…The eunuch's tale: Reviewing reviewed (1995)The eunuch's tale: Reviewing …What is the source of bias in peer review? (1982)What is the source of bias in…Theoretical implications of failure to detect prepublished submissions (1982)Theoretical implications of f…The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)The fate of published article…Rejection, rebuttal, revision: Some flexible features of peer review (1982)Rejection, rebuttal, revision…Peer reviewing: Improve or be rejected (1982)Peer reviewing: Improve or be…Peer review in the physical sciences: An editor's view (1982)Peer review in the physical s…On the failure to detect previously published research (1982)On the failure to detect prev…On peer review: “We have met the enemy and he is us” (1982)On peer review: “We have met …Manuscript evaluation by journal referees and editors: Randomness or bias? (1982)Manuscript evaluation by jour…Interreferee agreement and acceptance rates in physics (1982)Interreferee agreement and ac…Editorial responsibilities in manuscript review (1982)Editorial responsibilities in…A physics editor comments on Peters and Ceci's peer-review study (1982)A physics editor comments on …Improving Executive Decisions by Formalizing Dissent: The Corporate Devil's Advocate (1977)Improving Executive Decisions…Editors, manuscripts, and equal treatment (1977)Editors, manuscripts, and equ…Social Theory and Social Structure (1958)Statistical principles in experimental design. (1962)Toward an experimental ecology of human development. (1977)Does the need for agreement among reviewers inhibit the publication controversial findings? (1991)Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review (1991)Institutionalized Dualism: Statistical Significance Testing as Myth and Ceremony (2009)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature. (1985)Paradigm debates and marketing theory, thought and practice (2014)Marketing, Rhetoric, and Control (2018)Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. (1968)Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. (1968)INQUIRY METHOD, GOAL DIFFICULTY, AND CONTEXT EFFECTS ON PERFORMANCE (1980)Dissent in Organizations (1981)Effects of Planning Aids and Presentation Media on Performance and Affective Responses in Strategic Decision-Making (1984)The Bases of Social Power (1986)Is Review By Peers As Fair As It Appears (1982)Peer Review As Boundary Work (2012)Improving editorial procedures. (1990)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 1977Improving Executive Decisions by Formalizing Dissent: The Corporate Devil's Advocate63 cited
  • 1982A physics editor comments on Peters and Ceci's peer-review study57 cited
  • 1982Manuscript evaluation by journal referees and editors: Randomness or bias?50 cited
  • 1982Interreferee agreement and acceptance rates in physics50 cited
  • 1982What is the source of bias in peer review?47 cited
  • 1982On peer review: “We have met the enemy and he is us”47 cited
  • 1982Peer reviewing: Improve or be rejected41 cited
  • 1982Theoretical implications of failure to detect prepublished submissions38 cited
  • 1982Rejection, rebuttal, revision: Some flexible features of peer review37 cited
  • 1995The eunuch's tale: Reviewing reviewed17 cited
  • 2014How to review journal manuscripts: A lesson learnt from the world's excellent reviewers16 cited
  • 1982Editorial responsibilities in manuscript review16 cited
  • 1982The fate of published articles, submitted again12 cited
  • 1977Editors, manuscripts, and equal treatment12 cited
  • 1982On the failure to detect previously published research

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

12 cited
  • 1982Peer review in the physical sciences: An editor's view9 cited