'Zulu, we need [it] for our culture': Umlazi adolescents in the post-apartheid state

Stephanie Inge Rudwick

40 citations0/0 files storedSouthern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies Multilingual Education and Policy Language and Culture

Abstract

Against the background of the hegemony of the English language, this paper examines attitudes and behaviour towards language amongst isiZulu-speaking youth in a South African township environment. It specifically focuses on what appear to be ambivalent and seemingly contradictory views of young isiZulu L1-speakers about the status and function of languages in their lives. Methodologically the study is based on triangulation, employing questionnaires, interviews and participant observation as data resources. The findings suggest that although the Umlazi youths are generally divided in terms of their attitudes towards English, there seems to exist a wide consensus as to the importance and specific functions of the mother-tongue isiZulu. The youngsters explicitly draw a direct link between their mother-tongue and their home culture and express strong pride with regards to this ethnolinguistic identity. IsiZulu is regarded as a cultural resource and prerequisite to maintain symbols and practices of Zulu tradition. However, a pragmatic and economically-motivated English/isiZulu division appears to prevail in their lives, as English is regarded as what is termed the 'communicative' language by the Umlazi youths. The collected data strongly support the claim that many African language speakers have a love-hate relationship with the English language (De Klerk & Gough, 2002: 370) and further suggest that there exists little indication that learners identify with the language other than perceiving it as an instrument to obtain academic and economic success. These findings are indicative of the sociolinguistic dilemma in which many young South Africans whose mother-tongue is not English find themselves.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 40 citations exist upstream.

References

1983Local Knowledge: Further Essays In Interpretive Anthropology 1987Decolonising the Mind: The Politics of Language in African Literature 1998Rethinking linguistic relativity. Ed. By John J. Gumperz and Stephen C. Levinson. (Studies in the social and cultural foundations of language 17.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. Pp. 488 2002Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung 2019Language, Thought, and Reality 2007Ethnography of Communication 1999Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung : eine Anleitung zu qualitativem Denken 1991Rethinking Linguistic Relativity

Cited by

2014The (dis)ownership of English: language and identity construction among Zulu students at the University of KwaZulu-Natal 2010Bantu languages in education in South Africa: an overview. Ongekho akekho ! – the absentee owner 2021Raced Repertoires: The Linguistic Repertoire as Multi-Semiotic and Racialized 2020Revisiting the prevalence of English: language use outside the home in South Africa 2013Divided loyalties: Zulu vis-à-vis English at the University of KwaZulu-Natal

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.