SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The assessment of the quality of reporting of meta-analyses in diagnostic research: a systematic review
16 references·16 citing·33 second hopsampled
The assessment of the quality of reporting of meta-analyses in diagnostic research: a systematic review (2011)The assessment of the quality of reportin…The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed (2010)The quality of reports of ran…The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for repo…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (2008)Systematic Reviews of Diagnos…Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Bivariate analysis of sensiti…Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate…The Measurement of Interrater Agreement (2003)The Measurement of Interrater…Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Quantifying heterogeneity in …Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines (2002)Conducting systematic reviews…Publication and Related Biases (2001)Publication and Related BiasesA hierarchical regression approach to meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations (2001)A hierarchical regression app…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…Estimating Diagnostic Accuracy from Multiple Conflicting Reports (1993)Estimating Diagnostic Accurac…Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary roc curve: Data‐analytic approaches and some additional considerations (1993)Combining independent studies…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Measurement of Observer A…A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)A Coefficient of Agreement fo…The psychology of obesity: An umbrella review and evidence-based map of the psychological correlates of heavier body weight (2020)The psychology of obesity: An…Reporting quality in systematic reviews of in vitro studies: a systematic review (2019)Reporting quality in systemat…Methods and reporting of systematic reviews of comparative accuracy were deficient: a methodological survey and proposed guidance (2019)Methods and reporting of syst…Systematic review and meta-analysis in GI endoscopy: Why do we need them? How can we read them? Should we trust them? (2018)Systematic review and meta-an…Random‐effects meta‐analysis of the clinical utility of tests and prediction models (2018)Random‐effects meta‐analysis …Protocol for the development of a CONSORT extension for RCTs using cohorts and routinely collected health data (2018)Protocol for the development …Completeness of Reporting of Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Based on the PRISMA-DTA Reporting Guideline (2018)Completeness of Reporting of …The art and science of study identification: a comparative analysis of two systematic reviews (2016)The art and science of study …Quality Assessment and Factor Analysis of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Endoscopic Ultrasound Diagnosis (2015)Quality Assessment and Factor…A review of methods and tools to assess the implementation of government policies to create healthy food environments for preventing obesity and diet-related non-communicable diseases (2015)A review of methods and tools…The Assessment of the Quality of Reporting of Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analyses in Diagnostic Tests Published by Authors in China (2014)The Assessment of the Quality…Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analyses of Acupuncture (2014)Reporting Quality of Systemat…Quality of reporting of systematic reviews published in “evidence-based” Chinese journals (2014)Quality of reporting of syste…Reporting completeness of abstracts of systematic reviews published in leading dental specialty journals (2013)Reporting completeness of abs…La declaración PRISMA: un paso adelante en la mejora de las publicaciones de la Revista Española de Salud Pública (2013)La declaración PRISMA: un pas…Incomplete Reporting of Baseline Characteristics in Clinical Trials: An Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Systematic Reviews Involving Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain (2013)Incomplete Reporting of Basel…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement (2015)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance (2003)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses (2011)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Simulation Run Length Control in the Presence of an Initial Transient (1983)Item Response Theory (1985)Meta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data (2006)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration (2018)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic (2012)Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests (2001)Screening for Depression in the General Population with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D): A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis (2016)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
  • 1960A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales42,335 cited
  • 2002Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis36,730 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration17,627 cited
  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 2005Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews3,362 cited
  • 2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative3,215 cited
  • 2001A hierarchical regression approach to meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations1,509 cited
  • 1993Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary roc curve: Data‐analytic approaches and some additional considerations1,404 cited
  • 2008Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy1,124 cited
  • 2002Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines960 cited
  • 2003The Measurement of Interrater Agreement513 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2010
The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed
503 cited
  • 2001Publication and Related Biases465 cited
  • 1993Estimating Diagnostic Accuracy from Multiple Conflicting Reports434 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2020The psychology of obesity: An umbrella review and evidence-based map of the psychological correlates of heavier body weight73 cited
    • 2013La declaración PRISMA: un paso adelante en la mejora de las publicaciones de la Revista Española de Salud Pública70 cited
    • 2018Random‐effects meta‐analysis of the clinical utility of tests and prediction models44 cited
    • 2015A review of methods and tools to assess the implementation of government policies to create healthy food environments for preventing obesity and diet-related non-communicable diseases44 cited
    • 2018Protocol for the development of a CONSORT extension for RCTs using cohorts and routinely collected health data38 cited
    • 2018Completeness of Reporting of Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Based on the PRISMA-DTA Reporting Guideline37 cited
    • 2014Quality of reporting of systematic reviews published in “evidence-based” Chinese journals33 cited
    • 2013Reporting completeness of abstracts of systematic reviews published in leading dental specialty journals31 cited
    • 2014Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analyses of Acupuncture29 cited
    • 2019Reporting quality in systematic reviews of in vitro studies: a systematic review29 cited
    • 2014The Assessment of the Quality of Reporting of Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analyses in Diagnostic Tests Published by Authors in China27 cited
    • 2016The art and science of study identification: a comparative analysis of two systematic reviews22 cited
    • 2019Methods and reporting of systematic reviews of comparative accuracy were deficient: a methodological survey and proposed guidance22 cited
    • 2015Quality Assessment and Factor Analysis of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Endoscopic Ultrasound Diagnosis17 cited
    • 2013Incomplete Reporting of Baseline Characteristics in Clinical Trials: An Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Systematic Reviews Involving Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain15 cited
    • 2018Systematic review and meta-analysis in GI endoscopy: Why do we need them? How can we read them? Should we trust them?15 cited