Participation in intra‐firm communities of practice: a case study from the automotive industry

Patricia Wolf · Sebastian Spaeth · Stefan Haefliger

28 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Knowledge Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Knowledge Management and Sharing Innovation and Knowledge Management Innovative Education and Learning Practices

Abstract

Purpose Communities of practice (CoPs) have been found to support knowledge creation by enabling knowledge sharing among experts in firms. However, some perform better than others. This paper seeks to explore what incentivizes employees to share knowledge in intra‐firm CoPs. Design/methodology/approach The paper presents a longitudinal case study in a large automotive company that introduced 82 cross‐functional CoPs into its engineering department. Using extensive qualitative data, two sets of communities: best and worst performing were analyzed. Findings It was found that perceived benefits and the employees' willingness to invest individual efforts into community work are stronger in better performing communities. Members of the better performing CoPs drew most benefits from participating in organizational decision processes, as they were able to influence the agenda and create relevant standards. The patterns observed relate to the efforts, benefits, and barriers of community work. Research limitations/implications The single case study design limits the generalizability of the results beyond the company studied. Furthermore, some of the data employed were perceptional and relied partly on self‐reporting of the community members. Practical implications The paper argues that management support for CoPs should aim at influencing the individual cost‐benefit calculus of community members. Respecting and implementing results from the communities' work is likely to provide the very basis for innovations to emerge at all. Originality/value Other than extant studies on CoP performance that focus on company benefits from deploying CoPs, this paper offers a new perspective by exploring the benefits and incentives available to community members.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 28 citations exist upstream.

References

1994Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.1980Qualitative research and evaluation methods 1991Situated Learning 1994A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation 2008Qualitative Data Analysis 1996Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach 2023An Introduction to Qualitative Research 1991Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation

Cited by

2016In search of innovative capabilities of communities of practice: A systematic review and typology for future research 2020Elucidating salespeople's market orientation, proactive service behavior and organizational culture in the B2B banking sector: a Malaysian perspective 2020Improving public sector knowledge sharing through communities of practice 2014Adopting Knowledge Management Mechanisms: Evidence from Portuguese Organizations 2018Communities of practice in healthcare: A framework for managing knowledge sharing in operations

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.