Norms and high-level cognition: Consequences, trends, and antidotes

Simon McNair · Aidan Feeney

2 citations0/0 files storedBehavioral and Brain Sciences

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference

Abstract

Abstract We are neither as pessimistic nor as optimistic as Elqayam & Evans (E&E). The consequences of normativism have not been uniformly disastrous, even among the examples they consider. However, normativism won't be going away any time soon and in the literature on causal Bayes nets new debates about normativism are emerging. Finally, we suggest that to concentrate on expert reasoners as an antidote to normativism may limit the contribution of research on thinking to basic psychological science.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 2 citations exist upstream.

References

1973On the psychology of prediction.2002The Big Book of Concepts 1967Man as an intuitive statistician.2007Bayesian Rationality 2007Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking 1988Presentation and content: The use of base rates as a continuous variable.2007Base-rate respect: From ecological rationality to dual processes 2001Solving probabilistic and statistical problems: a matter of information structure and question form

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.