THE SLOWDOWN IN FIRST-RESPONSE TIMES OF ECONOMICS JOURNALS: CAN IT BE BENEFICIAL?

Ofer H. Azar

7 citations0/0 files storedEconomic Inquiry

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Publishing and Scholarly Communication Academic Writing and Publishing Academic Publishing and Open Access

Abstract

The first response time (henceforth FRT) of economics journals has increased over the last four decades from 1-2 months to 3-6 months.The optimal FRT, however, is not zero, because

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 7 citations exist upstream.

References

1994Monotone Comparative Statics 2000The Slowdown of the Economics Publishing Process 2016The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review 2001Free Labor for Costly Journals?2002Evolving Standards for Academic Publishing: A q‐r Theory 1988Estimates of the Returns to Quality and Coauthorship in Economic Academia 2002Journal Pricing and Mergers: A Portfolio Approach 1990Is There Value-Added from the Review Process in Economics?: Preliminary Evidence from Authors

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.