SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Bad Reporting or Bad Science? Systematic Data Evaluation as a Means to Improve the Use of Peer-Reviewed Studies in Risk Assessments of Chemicals
2 references·2 citing·17 second hop
Bad Reporting or Bad Science? Systematic Data Evaluation as a Means to Improve the Use of Peer-Reviewed Studies in Risk Assessments of Chemicals (2013)Bad Reporting or Bad Science? Systematic …Instruments for Assessing Risk of Bias and Other Methodological Criteria of Published Animal Studies: A Systematic Review (2013)Instruments for Assessing Ris…Information Quality in Regulatory Decision Making: Peer Review versus Good Laboratory Practice (2012)Information Quality in Regula…Evidence of citation bias in the pesticide ecotoxicology literature (2018)Evidence of citation bias in …An academic researcher's guide to increased impact on regulatory assessment of chemicals (2017)An academic researcher's guid…Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism (1990)The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)The Problem of Biased Data and Potential Solutions for Health and Environmental Assessments (2014)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)How credible are the study results? Evaluating and applying internal validity tools to literature-based assessments of environmental health hazards (2016)Recommendations for the conduct of systematic reviews in toxicology and environmental health research (COSTER) (2020)Principles and framework for assessing the risk of bias for studies included in comparative quantitative environmental systematic reviews (2022)Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making (2010)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Distinguishing between research and monitoring programs in environmental science and management (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013Instruments for Assessing Risk of Bias and Other Methodological Criteria of Published Animal Studies: A Systematic Review147 cited
  • 2012Information Quality in Regulatory Decision Making: Peer Review versus Good Laboratory Practice37 cited

Cited by

  • 2017An academic researcher's guide to increased impact on regulatory assessment of chemicals25 cited
  • 2018Evidence of citation bias in the pesticide ecotoxicology literature19 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work