SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Problem of Biased Data and Potential Solutions for Health and Environmental Assessments
16 references·0 citing·37 second hop
The Problem of Biased Data and Potential Solutions for Health and Environmental Assessments (2014)The Problem of Biased Data and Potential …Scientific method: Statistical errors (2014)Scientific method: Statistica…Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Who's Afraid of Peer Review?The New Statistics (2013)The New StatisticsP-curve: A key to the file-drawer. (2013)P-curve: A key to the file-dr…Scientific Utopia (2012)Scientific UtopiaMisconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Misconduct accounts for the m…False-Positive Psychology (2011)False-Positive PsychologyBelieve it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? (2011)Believe it or not: how much c…Publication Bias in Reports of Animal Stroke Studies Leads to Major Overstatement of Efficacy (2010)Publication Bias in Reports o…Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Do Pressures to Publish Incre…How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)How Many Scientists Fabricate…Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (2008)Empirical evidence of bias in…Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer review: a flawed process…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. D…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of BiasPseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments (1984)Pseudoreplication and the Des…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science (2015)The fickle P value generates irreproducible results (2015)GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions (2019)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)How Big Is “Big”? Interpreting Effect Sizes in L2 Research (2014)How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses (2018)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2021)Sample Size Justification (2022)Statistical principles in experimental design. (1962)R. A. Fisher, the Life of a Scientist (1978)Spatial autocorrelation and red herrings in geographical ecology (2003)Spatial analysis a guide for ecologists (2005)Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review (2007)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling. (1983)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)A power primer. (1992)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Mini Meta‐Analysis of Your Own Studies: Some Arguments on Why and a Primer on How (2016)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 (2018)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1984Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments8,369 cited
  • 2011False-Positive Psychology6,561 cited
  • 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
  • 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
  • 2013The New Statistics3,182 cited
  • 2008Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study2,534 cited
  • 2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data1,909 cited
  • 2011Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?1,885 cited
  • 2014Scientific method: Statistical errors1,536 cited
  • 2013P-curve: A key to the file-drawer.1,501 cited
  • 2012Scientific Utopia1,301 cited
  • 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,231 cited
  • 2013Who's Afraid of Peer Review?934 cited
  • 2010Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data804 cited
  • 2006Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

794 cited
  • 2010Publication Bias in Reports of Animal Stroke Studies Leads to Major Overstatement of Efficacy600 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.