Unit accentuation as an expression device for predicate formation in Danish?

Abstract

In the present paper, I discuss some results of an empirical investigation of spontaneous speech in Danish concerning Unit Accentuation with special reference to stress reduction in contentive verbs in various morphosyntactic contexts. The reference frame for my description is Simon C. Dik and followers' Functional Grammar (FG) as expounded in Dik (1989) - both because this work is, as yet, the most updated framework of Functionalism, and because my own version of the functional paradigm is not supposed to be known (an extensive exposition is Nedergaard Thomsen 1991). Needless to say, my model is adduced throughout. My results indicate that several corrections have to be made within FG in order for this theory to be typologically adequate as regards the description of Danish: thus e.g. its model of the layered structure of the clause (with the distinction between Arguments and Satellites) has to be modified so as to include a more nuclear layer $#x201C;around” the predicate, the ‘Nucleus’. This layer consists of semantic material at least some of which constitutes a conceptual unit with the predicate. Only nuclear sentence members trigger Unit Accentuation. Unit Accentuation is clearly grammatically obligatory in some contexts, and excluded in others. However, it is observed in cases where it is grammatically excluded. In some of these cases, it seems to be motivated by semantic extensions of prototypes. Thus, Unit Accentuation should be conceived of as a productive rule. Not only ideational factors, but also textual-pragmatic (‘theticity’, cf. Sasse 1987) and $#x201C;rhetorical” factors (‘idiomaticily’, cf. Chafe 1968) may determine Unit Accentuation. In all its distributions, UA encodes conceptual units. I hypothesize that Unit Accentuation in verb headed hypotagms is a coding device for (the $#x201C;formation” of) derived/marked predicates. Due to the fact that at least some of the semantic factors conditioning stress reduction correspond to categories that undergo morphological ‘Noun Incorporation’ in e.g. agglutinating or polysynthetic languages, viz. e.g. non-referential $#x201C;objects”, I have made the generalization that Unit Accentuation is a manifestation of syntactic Incorporation. What perhaps is special to Danish is the Incorporation of e.g. local, translocal, predicative, existential, and adverbial (including several types of verbal particles) verbal modifiers.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 21 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.