SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Laboratory effects models for interlaboratory comparisons · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleLaboratory effects models for interlaboratory comparisons

Blaza Toman2009

Article2009

Laboratory effects models for interlaboratory comparisons

Blaza Toman · Antonio M. Possolo

86 citations·0/0 files stored·Accreditation and Quality Assurance

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control Reliability and Agreement in Measurement

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 86 citations exist upstream.

References

2006GUIDE TO THE EXPRESSION OF UNCERTAINTY IN MEASUREMENT 2002The evaluation of key comparison data 2007The evaluation of key comparison data: determining the largest consistent subset 2007Assessment of measurement uncertainty via observation equations

Cited by

2017Invited Article: Concepts and tools for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty 2014On the adjustment of inconsistent data using the Birge ratio 2010Analysis of key comparisons: estimating laboratories' biases by a fixed effects model using Bayesian model averaging 2013Analysis of key comparison data: critical assessment of elements of current practice with suggested improvements 2010Laplace random effects models for interlaboratory studies 2018Three certified sugar reference materials for carbon isotope delta measurements 2014Statistical models and computation to evaluate measurement uncertainty 2016Chemical purity using quantitative1H-nuclear magnetic resonance: a hierarchical Bayesian approach for traceable calibrations

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2017Consensus building for interlaboratory studies, key comparisons, and meta-analysisarticle · 4 shared references 2008Analysis of key comparison data and laboratory biasesarticle · 3 shared references 2008A comparison of location estimators for interlaboratory data contaminated with value and uncertainty outliersarticle · 3 shared references 2006Recent recommendations of the Consultative Committee for Length (CCL) regarding strategies for evaluating key comparison dataarticle · 3 shared references 2021The Data Evaluation of Interlaboratory Comparisons for Calibration Laboratorieschapter · 3 shared references 2012Measurement, Models, and Uncertaintyarticle · 2 shared references

Details

Year2009

Typearticle

Published2009-06-15

VenueAccreditation and Quality Assurance

ISSN-L0949-1775

Languageen

Citations86

Files0 public / 0

ShelfScientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation

Identifiers

doi10.1007/s00769-009-0547-2

openalex_workW2021744602

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.