SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
PREFERENCE FOR FLUENT VERSUS DISFLUENT WORK SCHEDULES
6 references·2 citing·32 second hop
PREFERENCE FOR FLUENT VERSUS DISFLUENT WORK SCHEDULES (2011)PREFERENCE FOR FLUENT VERSUS DISFLUENT WO…AN EVALUATION OF THE VALUE OF CHOICE WITH PRESCHOOL CHILDREN (2006)AN EVALUATION OF THE VALUE OF…MOTIVATING OPERATIONS AND TERMS TO DESCRIBE THEM: SOME FURTHER REFINEMENTS (2003)MOTIVATING OPERATIONS AND TER…EMERGENCE OF REINFORCER PREFERENCE AS A FUNCTION OF SCHEDULE REQUIREMENTS AND STIMULUS SIMILARITY (1997)EMERGENCE OF REINFORCER PREFE…EVALUATION OF A MULTIPLE‐STIMULUS PRESENTATION FORMAT FOR ASSESSING REINFORCER PREFERENCES (1996)EVALUATION OF A MULTIPLE‐STIM…EFFECTS OF PROBLEM DIFFICULTY AND REINFORCER QUALITY ON TIME ALLOCATED TO CONCURRENT ARITHMETIC PROBLEMS (1996)EFFECTS OF PROBLEM DIFFICULTY…PREFERENCE FOR REINFORCERS UNDER VARYING SCHEDULE ARRANGEMENTS: A BEHAVIORAL ECONOMIC ANALYSIS (1994)PREFERENCE FOR REINFORCERS UN…Preference for and Efficacy of Accumulated and Distributed Response–Reinforcer Arrangements During Skill Acquisition (2018)Preference for and Efficacy o…The effects of work‐reinforcer schedules on performance and preference in students with autism (2015)The effects of work‐reinforce…THE EFFECTS OF BRIEF AND EXTENDED STIMULUS AVAILABILITY ON PREFERENCE (2007)Distributed and accumulated reinforcement arrangements: Evaluations of efficacy and preference (2014)RELATIVE AND ABSOLUTE STRENGTH OF RESPONSE AS A FUNCTION OF FREQUENCY OF REINFORCEMENT 1, 2 (1961)A COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES FOR IDENTIFYING REINFORCERS FOR PERSONS WITH SEVERE AND PROFOUND DISABILITIES (1992)EFFECTS OF NONCONTINGENT REINFORCEMENT ON PROBLEM BEHAVIOR AND STIMULUS ENGAGEMENT: THE ROLE OF SATIATION, EXTINCTION, AND ALTERNATIVE REINFORCEMENT (2000)REINFORCEMENT MAGNITUDE: AN EVALUATION OF PREFERENCE AND REINFORCER EFFICACY (2008)Token reinforcement: Translational research and application (2018)DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN DISCRIMINATIVE AND MOTIVATIONAL FUNCTIONS OF STIMULI (1982)Clinical Application of Functional Analysis Methodology (2008)Intimate partner violence theoretical considerations: Moving towards a contextual framework (2008)Vulnerable Decision Points for Disproportionate Office Discipline Referrals: Comparisons of Discipline for African American and White Elementary School Students (2016)Applied Behavior Analysis for Teachers (2024)Applied Behavior Analysis for Teachers (2024)ECONOMIC CONCEPTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR (1980)THE EFFECTS OF ERRORLESS LEARNING AND BACKWARD CHAINING ON THE ACQUISITION OF INTERNET SKILLS IN ADULTS WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES (2007)Impacts of autonomy-supportive versus controlling instructional language on motor learning (2014)Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning (2016)ASSESSMENT OF STIMULUS PREFERENCE AND REINFORCER VALUE WITH PROFOUNDLY RETARDED INDIVIDUALS (1985)USING A CHOICE ASSESSMENT TO PREDICT REINFORCER EFFECTIVENESS (1996)EVALUATION OF A BRIEF STIMULUS PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT (1998)EVALUATION OF A BRIEF MULTIPLE‐STIMULUS PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT IN A NATURALISTIC CONTEXT (2000)Stereotypy I: A review of behavioral assessment and treatment (2005)ON THE LAW OF EFFECT 1 (1970)Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1972 (1974)EXAMINATION OF RELATIVE REINFORCEMENT EFFECTS OF STIMULI IDENTIFIED THROUGH PRETREATMENT AND DAILY BRIEF PREFERENCE ASSESSMENTS (2001)ON THE APPLIED USE OF PROGRESSIVE‐RATIO SCHEDULES OF REINFORCEMENT (2008)REDUCING BEHAVIOR PROBLEMS THROUGH FUNCTIONAL COMMUNICATION TRAINING (1985)THE EFFECTS OF MAGNITUDE AND QUALITY OF REINFORCEMENT ON CHOICE RESPONDING DURING PLAY ACTIVITIES (2002)Learned Helplessness and Students with Emotional or Behavioral Disorders: Deprivation in the Classroom (2004)CONCURRENT REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULES FOR PROBLEM BEHAVIOR AND APPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR: EXPERIMENTAL APPLICATIONS OF THE MATCHING LAW (2010)THE RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE BEHAVIORAL TREATMENT (1988)Discrete Trial Training in the Treatment of Autism (2001)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1996EVALUATION OF A MULTIPLE‐STIMULUS PRESENTATION FORMAT FOR ASSESSING REINFORCER PREFERENCES1,417 cited
  • 2003MOTIVATING OPERATIONS AND TERMS TO DESCRIBE THEM: SOME FURTHER REFINEMENTS714 cited
  • 2006AN EVALUATION OF THE VALUE OF CHOICE WITH PRESCHOOL CHILDREN119 cited
  • 1994PREFERENCE FOR REINFORCERS UNDER VARYING SCHEDULE ARRANGEMENTS: A BEHAVIORAL ECONOMIC ANALYSIS102 cited
  • 1996EFFECTS OF PROBLEM DIFFICULTY AND REINFORCER QUALITY ON TIME ALLOCATED TO CONCURRENT ARITHMETIC PROBLEMS93 cited
  • 1997EMERGENCE OF REINFORCER PREFERENCE AS A FUNCTION OF SCHEDULE REQUIREMENTS AND STIMULUS SIMILARITY84 cited

Cited by

  • 2018Preference for and Efficacy of Accumulated and Distributed Response–Reinforcer Arrangements During Skill Acquisition23 cited
  • 2015The effects of work‐reinforcer schedules on performance and preference in students with autism21 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work