SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Validity of the Impact Factor of Journals as a Measure of Randomized Controlled Trial Quality
0 references·10 citing·39 second hop
Validity of the Impact Factor of Journals as a Measure of Randomized Controlled Trial Quality (2006)Validity of the Impact Factor of Journals…Quantity and quality are increasing but there's room for improvement: A scoping review of physical activity intervention trials (2024)Quantity and quality are incr…Indicators of questionable research practices were identified in 163,129 randomized controlled trials (2022)Indicators of questionable re…The quality of reporting randomized controlled trials in the dermatology literature in an era where the CONSORT statement is a standard (2018)The quality of reporting rand…Randomized clinical trials of dental bleaching – Compliance with the CONSORT Statement: a systematic review (2017)Randomized clinical trials of…Methodological quality in clinical trials and bibliometric indicators: no evidence of correlations (2013)Methodological quality in cli…Assessments of the quality of randomized controlled trials published in I nternational J ournal of U rology from 1994 to 2011 (2013)Assessments of the quality of…Quality of randomised controlled trials in dentistry (2011)Quality of randomised control…An overview and analysis of journal operations, journal publication patterns, and journal impact in school psychology and related fields (2011)An overview and analysis of j…The Publication Rate and Impact of Abstracts Presented at the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (1999–2005) (2008)The Publication Rate and Impa…Journal impact factor and its importance for AFP. (2008)Journal impact factor and its…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Analysis of randomized controlled trials in Rheumatology International from 1981 to 2012: methodological assessment (2014)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)Evaluation of the reporting quality of observational studies in master of public health dissertations in China (2020)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Measurement and Control of Response Bias (1991)The Reviewer's Guide to Quantitative Methods in the Social Sciences (2010)Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2011)Association of Journal Quality Indicators With Methodological Quality of Clinical Research Articles (2002)Journal Prestige, Publication Bias, and Other Characteristics Associated With Citation of Published Studies in Peer-Reviewed Journals (2002)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Spin in abstracts of randomized controlled trials in dentistry (2019)Extent and prevalence of spin in randomized controlled trials in dentistry (2020)Fate of Cardiology Research Originally Published in Abstract Form (1980)More insight into the fate of biomedical meeting abstracts: a systematic review (2003)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Publicaciones derivadas de las comunicaciones a los congresos anuales de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología (2013)Current rates of publication for podium and poster presentations at the american society for surgery of the hand annual meetings. (2014)Conversion of Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine abstract presentations to manuscript publications (2015)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)COMPLIANCE OF RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS ON DENTAL CARIES PREVENTION METHODS WITH THE CONSORT STATEMENT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (2021)Compliance of randomized controlled trials in posterior restorations with the CONSORT statement: a systematic review of methodology (2021)CONSORT statement adherence and risk of bias in randomized controlled trials on deep caries management: a meta-research (2024)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Assessment of the reporting quality of double-blind RCTs for ischemic stroke based on the CONSORT statement (2020)Development and Validation of a Natural Language Processing Tool to Generate the CONSORT Reporting Checklist for Randomized Clinical Trials (2020)New international reporting guidelines for clinical trials evaluating effectiveness of artificial intelligence interventions in dermatology: strengthening the SPIRIT of robust trial reporting (2021)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Reproducibility in Science (2014)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2011An overview and analysis of journal operations, journal publication patterns, and journal impact in school psychology and related fields38 cited
  • 2011Quality of randomised controlled trials in dentistry35 cited
  • 2017Randomized clinical trials of dental bleaching – Compliance with the CONSORT Statement: a systematic review34 cited
  • 2018The quality of reporting randomized controlled trials in the dermatology literature in an era where the CONSORT statement is a standard26 cited
  • 2008The Publication Rate and Impact of Abstracts Presented at the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (1999–2005)22 cited
  • 2022Indicators of questionable research practices were identified in 163,129 randomized controlled trials18 cited
  • 2013Assessments of the quality of randomized controlled trials published in I nternational J ournal of U rology from 1994 to 201111 cited
  • 2013Methodological quality in clinical trials and bibliometric indicators: no evidence of correlations11 cited
  • 2024Quantity and quality are increasing but there's room for improvement: A scoping review of physical activity intervention trials9 cited
  • 2008Journal impact factor and its importance for AFP.8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work