SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: Quality of design is not the only relevant variable
12 references·0 citing·37 second hop
Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: Quality of design is not the only relevant variable (1999)Assessing the quality of randomized contr…The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)The Hazards of Scoring the Qu…Randomized clinical trials in Hepatology: Predictors of quality (1999)Randomized clinical trials in…Quality assessment of reports on clinical trials in the Journal of Hepatology (1998)Quality assessment of reports…Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Does quality of reports of ra…The Importance of Quality of Primary Studies in Producing Unbiased Systematic Reviews (1996)The Importance of Quality of …Meta-analysis: An introduction and point of view (1996)Meta-analysis: An introductio…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Assessing the quality of repo…Assessing the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials:Current Issues and Future Directions (1996)Assessing the Quality of Rand…A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)A method for assessing the qu…An assessment of research methods reported in 103 scientific articles from two Canadian medical journals. (1961)An assessment of research met…Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Citation bias of hepato-biliary randomized clinical trials (2002)Published methodological quality of randomized controlled trials does not reflect the actual quality assessed in protocols (2012)Type II error and statistical power in reports of small animal clinical trials (2014)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields (2004)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (2013)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Impact of Study Quality on Outcome in Placebo-Controlled Trials of Homeopathy (1999)School programs targeting stress management in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis (2006)Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 3: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Randomized Trials (2009)Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires (1987)Interrater Reliability of the Modified Jadad Quality Scale for Systematic Reviews of Alzheimer’s Disease Drug Trials (2001)Examining the Value and Quality of Health Economic Analyses: Implications of Utilizing the QHES (2003)Effects of dance movement therapy and dance on health-related psychological outcomes: A meta-analysis (2013)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Review papers : The statistical basis of meta-analysis (1993)Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)A meta-analysis of the impact of short-term sleep deprivation on cognitive variables. (2010)Clinical trials in orthodontics II: assessment of the quality of reporting of clinical trials published in three orthodontic journals between 1989 and 1998 (2003)Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in Hodgkin Lymphoma in Biomedical Journals (2006)A systematic review of trends in the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials in various research fields (2008)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
  • 1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 1999The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis1,981 cited
  • 1981A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial1,349 cited
  • 1996Assessing the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials:Current Issues and Future Directions436 cited
  • 1996The Importance of Quality of Primary Studies in Producing Unbiased Systematic Reviews328 cited
  • 1999Randomized clinical trials in Hepatology: Predictors of quality119 cited
  • 1998Quality assessment of reports on clinical trials in the Journal of Hepatology58 cited
  • 1996Meta-analysis: An introduction and point of view47 cited
  • 1961An assessment of research methods reported in 103 scientific articles from two Canadian medical journals.41 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work