"The Only Proper Scale of Representation": The Politics of Statistics and Stories

Abstract

This essay explores the political resonances of quantitative methods in a reading of American discourse surrounding their social functions and virtues. Key texts are drawn from three periods: the founding period, the late nineteenth century, and social psychology in the mid-twentieth century. It is shown that the idea of quantification is closely associated with democratic ideals. In adopting these methods, scholars cloak themselves in the image of objective, deliberative, public-minded democratic participants. Critics of quantification indict its dehumanizing indifference to personal experience and its susceptibility to manipulation. It is concluded that quantification sits uneasily alongside history and story-telling as two poles of modern social description.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 57 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.