SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Implementing Systematic Review at the National Toxicology Program: Status and Next Steps
1 references·11 citing·39 second hop
Implementing Systematic Review at the National Toxicology Program: Status and Next Steps (2013)Implementing Systematic Review at the Nat…Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (2013)Finding What Works in Health …Advancing systematic-review methodology in exposure science for environmental health decision making (2020)Advancing systematic-review m…Novel text analytics approach to identify relevant literature for human health risk assessments: A pilot study with health effects of in utero exposures (2019)Novel text analytics approach…Adaptation of the Systematic Review Framework to the Assessment of Toxicological Test Methods: Challenges and Lessons Learned With the Zebrafish Embryotoxicity Test (2019)Adaptation of the Systematic …The Need for Systematic Reviews in Oncology (2018)The Need for Systematic Revie…Facilitating healthcare decisions by assessing the certainty in the evidence from preclinical animal studies (2018)Facilitating healthcare decis…Using systematic review in occupational safety and health (2017)Using systematic review in oc…A primer on systematic reviews in toxicology (2017)A primer on systematic review…How credible are the study results? Evaluating and applying internal validity tools to literature-based assessments of environmental health hazards (2016)How credible are the study re…The Navigation Guide Systematic Review Methodology: A Rigorous and Transparent Method for Translating Environmental Health Science into Better Health Outcomes (2014)The Navigation Guide Systemat…Systematic Review and Evidence Integration for Literature-Based Environmental Health Science Assessments (2014)Systematic Review and Evidenc…Implementing systematic review in toxicological profiles: ATSDR and NIEHS/NTP collaboration. (2014)Implementing systematic revie…Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)ROSES RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps (2018)A tool to assess risk of bias in non-randomized follow-up studies of exposure effects (ROBINS-E) (2024)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The risk of bias in observational studies of exposures (ROBINS-E) tool: concerns arising from application to observational studies of exposures (2018)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)A question of trust: can we build an evidence base to gain trust in systematic review automation technologies? (2019)COSMOS-E: Guidance on conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies of etiology (2019)Systematic evidence maps as a novel tool to support evidence-based decision-making in chemicals policy and risk management (2019)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Systematic Reviews in Occupational Health and Safety: where are we and where should we go? (2019)Expounding the knowledge conversion processes within the occupational safety and health management system (OSH-MS) using concept mapping (2020)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2010)A practical guide to preclinical systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)GRADE Guidelines 30: the GRADE approach to assessing the certainty of modeled evidence—An overview in the context of health decision-making (2020)Systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies (2024)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making (2010)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)“Hasta la vista, baby” – will machine learning terminate human literature reviews in entrepreneurship? (2021)Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review (2021)Towards the automation of systematic reviews using natural language processing, machine learning, and deep learning: a comprehensive review (2024)A Systematic Review of School-Based Interventions to Prevent Bullying (2007)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)Identifying the PECO: A framework for formulating good questions to explore the association of environmental and other exposures with health outcomes (2018)Improving the quality of toxicology and environmental health systematic reviews: What journal editors can do (2021)Biological plausibility in environmental health systematic reviews: a GRADE concept paper (2022)Biological plausibility in environmental health systematic reviews: a GRADE concept paper (2022)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)A risk of bias instrument for non-randomized studies of exposures: A users' guide to its application in the context of GRADE (2018)Cognitive bias research in forensic science: A systematic review (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews949 cited

Cited by

  • 2014Systematic Review and Evidence Integration for Literature-Based Environmental Health Science Assessments438 cited
  • 2014The Navigation Guide Systematic Review Methodology: A Rigorous and Transparent Method for Translating Environmental Health Science into Better Health Outcomes426 cited
  • 2018Facilitating healthcare decisions by assessing the certainty in the evidence from preclinical animal studies189 cited
  • 2016How credible are the study results? Evaluating and applying internal validity tools to literature-based assessments of environmental health hazards105 cited
  • 2017A primer on systematic reviews in toxicology98 cited
  • 2020Advancing systematic-review methodology in exposure science for environmental health decision making31 cited
  • 2019Novel text analytics approach to identify relevant literature for human health risk assessments: A pilot study with health effects of in utero exposures20 cited
  • 2017Using systematic review in occupational safety and health19 cited
  • 2018The Need for Systematic Reviews in Oncology17 cited
  • 2019Adaptation of the Systematic Review Framework to the Assessment of Toxicological Test Methods: Challenges and Lessons Learned With the Zebrafish Embryotoxicity Test11 cited
  • 2014Implementing systematic review in toxicological profiles: ATSDR and NIEHS/NTP collaboration.9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work