Fatal Knowledge? Prenatal Diagnosis and Sex Selection

Dorothy C. Wertz · John C. Fletcher

72 citations0/0 files storedThe Hastings Center Report

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences Ethics and bioethics in healthcare Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics

Abstract

Moral and social arguments weigh heavily against performing medical procedures solely for purposes of sex selection. The medical profession has a responsibility to abandon its posture of ethical neutrality and take a firm stand now against sex selection.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 72 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

1996Ethics of sex selection for family balancing: Family balancing as a morally acceptable application of sex selection 1999Should prenatal sex selection be restricted? Ethical questions and their implications for research and policy 1992Psychological aspects of genetic counseling. VIII. Suffering and countertransference 1993Prenatal diagnosis and sex selection in 19 nations 1993Fetal sex preference of second-trimester gravidas 2004Preconception gender selection for nonmedical reasons

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.