SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
What Levels of Agreement Can Be Expected Between Histopathologists Assigning Cases to Discrete Nominal Categories? A Study of the Diagnosis of Hyperplastic and Adenomatous Colorectal Polyps
4 references·2 citing·17 second hop
What Levels of Agreement Can Be Expected Between Histopathologists Assigning Cases to Discrete Nominal Categories? A Study of the Diagnosis of Hyperplastic and Adenomatous Colorectal Polyps (2000)What Levels of Agreement Can Be Expected …Grading and scoring in histopathology (1998)Grading and scoring in histop…Observer variability in the histopathological reporting of needle biopsy specimens of the prostate (1997)Observer variability in the h…Measuring repeatability and validity of histological diagnosis--a brief review with some practical examples. (1983)Measuring repeatability and v…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Measurement of Observer A…Investigating Various Thresholds as Immunohistochemistry Cutoffs for Observer Agreement (2016)Investigating Various Thresho…Observer accuracy in estimating proportions in images: implications for the semiquantitative assessment of staining reactions and a proposal for a new system (2001)Observer accuracy in estimati…Kappa statistics as indicators of quality assurance in histopathology and cytopathology. (1996)How accurate are subjective judgements of a continuum? (2003)Validity and Reproducibility of Immunohistochemical Scoring by Trained Non-Pathologists on Tissue Microarrays (2021)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)A study of Gleason score interpretation in different groups of UK pathologists; techniques for improving reproducibility (2006)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Measures of response agreement for qualitative data: Some generalizations and alternatives. (1971)Observer variation in the histological grading of rectal carcinoma. (1983)Poor agreement in recognition of abnormal mitoses: requirement for standardized and robust definitions (2001)Scoring of p53, VEGF, Bcl-2 and APAF-1 immunohistochemistry and interobserver reliability in colorectal cancer (2006)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Observer variation in immunohistochemical analysis of protein expression, time for a change? (2006)Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of interpretation of immunohistochemical stains of prostate cancer (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
  • 1983Measuring repeatability and validity of histological diagnosis--a brief review with some practical examples.115 cited
  • 1998Grading and scoring in histopathology112 cited
  • 1997Observer variability in the histopathological reporting of needle biopsy specimens of the prostate62 cited

Cited by

  • 2001Observer accuracy in estimating proportions in images: implications for the semiquantitative assessment of staining reactions and a proposal for a new system37 cited
  • 2016Investigating Various Thresholds as Immunohistochemistry Cutoffs for Observer Agreement9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work