Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

GENDER FACTORS IN REVIEWER RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MANUSCRIPT PUBLICATION

6 references·13 citing·43 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1968Are women prejudiced against women?627 cited
1971Evaluation of the performance of women as a function of their sex, achievement, and personal history.379 cited
1985What's in an author's name? Differential evaluations of performance as a function of author's name93 cited
1983Goldberg revisited: What's in an author's name85 cited
1977The Talking Platypus Phenomenon: Competency Ratings as a Function of Sex and Professional Status76 cited
1983Sex-Role Stereotypes: Traditions and Alternatives.63 cited

Cited by

2009To Name or Not to Name: The Effect of Changing Author Gender on Peer Review79 cited
1999The Review Process at PSPB: Correlates of Interreviewer Agreement and Manuscript Acceptance61 cited
2021Uncovering Latent Biases in Text: Method and Application to Peer Review28 cited
2020Letters of recommendation for surgical fellowships – Does gender make a difference?19 cited
2009A review of the review process: manuscript peer-review in biomedical research18 cited
2008Systematic Variation in Reviewer Practice According to Country and Gender in the Field of Ecology and Evolution17 cited
2015Bias in peer review: a case study16 cited
2020Reading Peer Review14 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2020

Mapping the Landscape of Peer Review in Computing Education Research

13 cited

2013Understanding the needs of international authors12 cited

2003Peer Review10 cited

1995The Case for Reviewing as Collaboration and Response8 cited

1992Critiquing the peer review process: Examining a potential dual role conflict.8 cited