The notion ofchild well‐beingappears in a large number of publications nowadays. Our review of the literature underlines both the oddly pathogenic approach tochild well‐beingand the scarcity of papers discussing a still poorly defined notion. Through this review, we identified the recourse to a binary language; from there, we derived five theoretical axes that heed the multidimensional and multilevel nature ofwell‐being, although for each one, a pole is here predominantly developed. We argue in favour of an override of a one‐dimensional, single‐level, unipolar approach tochild well‐beingand an exploration of its otherwise underdeveloped positive, hedonic, subjective, spiritual and collective dimensions.
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 143 citations exist upstream.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.