SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The orthopaedic trauma literature: an evaluation of statistically significant findings in orthopaedic trauma randomized trials
8 references·1 citing·40 second hop
The orthopaedic trauma literature: an evaluation of statistically significant findings in orthopaedic trauma randomized trials (2008)The orthopaedic trauma literature: an eva…The undue influence of significant p-values on the perceived importance of study results (2005)The undue influence of signif…Type II Error in the Spine Surgical Literature (2004)Type II Error in the Spine Su…THE QUALITY OF REPORTING OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY FROM 1988 THROUGH 2000 (2002)THE QUALITY OF REPORTING OF R…Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions (2002)Randomised trials in surgery:…APPLICATION OF THE CONSOLIDATED STANDARDS OF REPORTING TRIALS (CONSORT) IN THE FRACTURE CARE LITERATURE (2002)APPLICATION OF THE CONSOLIDAT…The statistical analysis of kappa statistics in multiple samples (1996)The statistical analysis of k…A power primer. (1992)A power primer.Measuring Agreement between Two Judges on the Presence or Absence of a Trait (1975)Measuring Agreement between T…Overview of randomised controlled trials in orthopaedic research: search for significant findings (2019)Overview of randomised contro…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Compliance with the CONSORT checklist in obstetric anaesthesia randomised controlled trials (2004)Determining the reporting quality of RCTs in clinical pharmacology (2004)Randomized Controlled Trials in Plastic Surgery: A 20-Year Review of Reporting Standards, Methodologic Quality, and Impact (2008)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)INTRODUCING LEVELS OF EVIDENCE TO THE JOURNAL (2003)Systematic Evaluation of the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials in Diabetes (2006)The Use of Confidence Intervals in Reporting Orthopaedic Research Findings (2009)Interpreting Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Orthopaedic Surgery (2020)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. (1971)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)Kappa coefficients in medical research (2002)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Why the p Value Alone Is Not Enough: The Need for Confidence Intervals in Plastic Surgery Research (2017)The Reliability of Clinical Methods, Data and Judgments (1975)High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes (1990)Modelling patterns of agreement for nominal scales (2007)Intrarater Reliability (2008)Advanced deep learning approaches to predict supply chain risks under COVID-19 restrictions (2022)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The Reporting of Randomized Clinical Trials Using a Surgical Intervention Is in Need of Immediate Improvement (2006)The reporting quality of randomised controlled trials in surgery: A systematic review (2007)The Fragility of Statistically Significant Findings From Randomized Trials in Sports Surgery: A Systematic Survey (2016)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)METHODOLOGICAL INDEX FOR NON-RANDOMIZED STUDIES ( MINORS ): DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A NEW INSTRUMENT (2003)A checklist to evaluate a report of a nonpharmacological trial (CLEAR NPT) was developed using consensus (2005)Methods and Processes of the CONSORT Group: Example of an Extension for Trials Assessing Nonpharmacologic Treatments (2008)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)A review of trauma and orthopaedic randomised clinical trials published in high-impact general medical journals (2021)Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review (2001)A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. (2002)Using PLS Path Modeling for Assessing Hierarchical Construct Models: Guidelines and Empirical Illustration1 (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1992A power primer.42,571 cited
  • 2002Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions762 cited
  • 1975Measuring Agreement between Two Judges on the Presence or Absence of a Trait501 cited
  • 2002THE QUALITY OF REPORTING OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY FROM 1988 THROUGH 2000243 cited
  • 1996The statistical analysis of kappa statistics in multiple samples94 cited
  • 2002APPLICATION OF THE CONSOLIDATED STANDARDS OF REPORTING TRIALS (CONSORT) IN THE FRACTURE CARE LITERATURE56 cited
  • 2005The undue influence of significant p-values on the perceived importance of study results40 cited
  • 2004Type II Error in the Spine Surgical Literature35 cited

Cited by

  • 2019Overview of randomised controlled trials in orthopaedic research: search for significant findings17 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work