Defending 'Defending Musical Perdurantism'

Ben Caplan · Carl A. Matheson

43 citations0/0 files storedThe British Journal of Aesthetics

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art Musicology and Musical Analysis Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics

Abstract

Julian Dodd has recently objected to musical perdurantism—the view that a musical work is a fusion of performances—on the grounds that it entails that one cannot hear all of a musical work and that a musical work can have temporal parts that belong to different ontological categories. We defend musical perdurantism from both objections.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 43 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2018Why can’t I change Bruckner’s Eighth Symphony?2008Musical Works: Ontology and Meta‐Ontology 2017A Return to Musical Idealism 2024An Ontology of Multiple Artworks

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.