What are Physical Objects?

Abstract

The concept of a physical object has figured prominently in the history of philosophy, and is probably more important now than it has ever been before.Yet the question What are physical objects?, i.e., What is the correct analysis of the concept of a physical object?, has received surprisingly little attention.The purpose of this paper is to address this question.I consider several attempts at answering the question, and give my reasons for preferring one of them over its rivals.The account of physical objects that I recommend -the Spatial Location Account -defines physical objects as objects with spatial locations.The intuitive idea behind the Spatial Location Account is this.Objects from all of the different ontological categoriesphysical objects; non---physical objects like souls, if there are any; propositions; universals; etc. - have this much in common: they all exist in time.But not all of them exist in space.The ones that exist in time and space, i.e., the ones that have spatial locations, are the ones that count as physical objects.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 105 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.