Article2009

The Ideational Foundations of Israel’s “Constitutional Revolution”

18 citations0/0 files storedPolitical Research Quarterly

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Judicial and Constitutional Studies American Constitutional Law and Politics Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies

Abstract

In the Israeli case, judicial empowerment has come primarily through judicial initiative rather than emerging from majoritarian institutions or strategic considerations relating to electoral politics. Justices with deep commitments to political-liberal rights engaged in a decades-long process of entrenching a political-liberal rights regime through jurisprudence. At the heart of this sea change in Israeli politics was a shift in ideas.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 18 citations exist upstream.

References

1998Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed 1998Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed 1996The Global expansion of judicial power 2003Judicial Review in New Democracies 1998The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective 2002On Law, Politics, and Judicialization 2004Towards juristocracy: the origins and consequences of the new constitutionalism 2005Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism

Cited by

2017The Achilles Heel of Democracy: Judicial Autonomy and the Rule of Law in Central America

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.