Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Sentencing strategies and justice: Effects of punishment philosophy on sentencing decisions.

4 references·16 citing·41 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1962Statistical principles in experimental design.27,141 cited
1965Delinquency and Drift1,076 cited
1975Beautiful but dangerous: Effects of offender attractiveness and nature of the crime on juridic judgment.359 cited
1973Sentencing as a Human Process274 cited

Cited by

2001Justice and utility in the classroom: An attributional analysis of the goals of teachers' punishment and intervention strategies.164 cited
1991Natural Observations of the Links between Attractiveness and Initial Legal Judgments106 cited
1988THE EFFECTS OF DEFENDANT AND JUROR ATTRACTIVENESS ON SIMULATED COURTROOM TRIAL DECISIONS92 cited
1982Purposes of punishment: Effects of utilities of criminal sanctions on perceived appropriateness.77 cited
2013FOLK RETRIBUTIVISM AND THE COMMUNICATION CONFOUND65 cited
2007The function of punishment in the “civil” commitment of sexually violent predators65 cited
1993Predictors of Sentencing Decisions: The Beliefs, Personality Variables, and Demographic Factors of Juvenile Justice62 cited
2009Retributive and restorative justice: Importance of crime severity and shared identity in people's justice responses58 cited
1987Public perception of sentencing in Perth, Western Australia47 cited
1994Is Defendant Status a Liability or a Shield? Crime Severity and Professional Relatedness

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

38 cited

1996When is defendant status a shield or a liability? Clarification and extension.35 cited

1985Sentencing severity with mock jurors: Predictive validity of three variable categories32 cited

2014The Role of Emotion and Cognition in Juror Perceptions of Victim Impact Statements29 cited

1989The purposes of sentencing: Public support for competing aims28 cited

1989Contextual Effects in Judgments of Crimes, Criminals, and the Purposes of Sentencing126 cited

1993Effects of Physical Attractiveness, Sex, and Type of Crime on Mock Juror Decisions25 cited