SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A ‘perverse incentive’ from bibliometrics: could National Research Assessment Exercises (NRAEs) restrict literature availability for nature conservation?
16 references·2 citing·50 second hop
A ‘perverse incentive’ from bibliometrics: could National Research Assessment Exercises (NRAEs) restrict literature availability for nature conservation? (2012)A ‘perverse incentive’ from bibliometrics…How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management (2012)How journal rankings can supp…Tracing 'productive interactions' to identify social impacts: an example from the social sciences (2011)Tracing 'productive interacti…The Research Excellence Framework and the 'impact agenda': are we creating a Frankenstein monster? (2011)The Research Excellence Frame…Measuring the Results of Science Investments (2011)Measuring the Results of Scie…Introducing 'productive interactions' in social impact assessment (2011)Introducing 'productive inter…‘Impact’ in the proposals for the UK's Research Excellence Framework: Shifting the boundaries of academic autonomy (2011)‘Impact’ in the proposals for…SJR and SNIP: two new journal metrics in Elsevier's Scopus (2010)SJR and SNIP: two new journal…Let's make science metrics more scientific (2010)Let's make science metrics mo…When Knowledge Wins: Transcending the Sense and Nonsense of Academic Rankings (2009)When Knowledge Wins: Transcen…Citation Statistics (2009)Citation StatisticsA Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures (2009)A Principal Component Analysi…The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation (2008)The top-ten in journal impact…The mismeasurement of science (2007)The mismeasurement of scienceAssessing university research: a plea for a balanced approach (2007)Assessing university research…The Precautionary Principle (2003)The Precautionary PrincipleThe UK Research Assessment Exercise: Unintended Consequences (2000)The UK Research Assessment Ex…The changing research landscape and reflections on national research assessment in the future (2019)The changing research landsca…Users beware: implications of database errors when assessing the individual research records of ecologists and conservation biologists (2013)Users beware: implications of…National Styles of Regulation: Environmental Policy in Great Britain and the United States (1986)Perception of Risk (1987)Perceived Risk, Trust, and Democracy (1993)The Precautionary Principle and Risk Perception: Experimental Studies in the EMF Area (2005)The Politics of Preemption and the War on Terror in Europe (2008)Uncertainty communication in environmental assessments: views from the Dutch science-policy interface (2008)Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Journal impact factor: a brief review. (1999)The Impact of Article Length on the Number of Future Citations: A Bibliometric Analysis of General Medicine Journals (2013)Empirical analysis and classification of database errors in Scopus and Web of Science (2016)Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) (2021)Fourth-Generation Evaluation (1988)Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts (1997)Fourth Generation Evaluation (2014)Does Interdisciplinary Research Lead to Higher Citation Impact? The Different Effect of Proximal and Distal Interdisciplinarity (2015)Innovation policy: what, why, and how (2017)The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (1998)The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (1999)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? (2011)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Exploratory Research (2020)On the Folly of Rewarding A, While Hoping for B. (1975)Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications (2014)Ranking Games (2014)Understanding societal impact through productive interactions: ICT research as a case (2014)The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies (1995)What is research collaboration? (1997)Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review (2015)The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields (1983)The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields (2004)Bad Management Theories Are Destroying Good Management Practices (2005)Publish and perish? Bibliometric analysis, journal ranking and the assessment of research quality in tourism (2010)Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs (2011)It’s a Bittersweet Symphony, this Life: Fragile Academic Selves and Insecure Identities at Work (2013)The transformational leader (1987)THE HOLLOWING OUT OF THE STATE: THE CHANGING NATURE OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE IN BRITAIN (1994)The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review (2001)Measuring the societal impact of research (2012)University partnerships for co-designing and co-producing urban sustainability (2014)Future sustainability scenarios for universities: moving beyond the United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (2015)Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications (2014)Using Publication Metrics to Highlight Academic Productivity and Research Impact (2014)Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level (2016)Measuring academic influence: Not all citations are equal (2014)Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability (2018)Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009When Knowledge Wins: Transcending the Sense and Nonsense of Academic Rankings852 cited
  • 2012How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management581 cited
  • 2009A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures574 cited
  • 2011Introducing 'productive interactions' in social impact assessment520 cited
  • 2011The Research Excellence Framework and the 'impact agenda': are we creating a Frankenstein monster?471 cited
  • 2003The Precautionary Principle373 cited
  • 2010Let's make science metrics more scientific305 cited
  • 2007The mismeasurement of science296 cited
  • 2009Citation Statistics285 cited
  • 2008The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation251 cited
  • 2011‘Impact’ in the proposals for the UK's Research Excellence Framework: Shifting the boundaries of academic autonomy192 cited
  • 2011Tracing 'productive interactions' to identify social impacts: an example from the social sciences180 cited
  • 2000The UK Research Assessment Exercise: Unintended Consequences169 cited
  • 2011Measuring the Results of Science Investments156 cited
  • 2007Assessing university research: a plea for a balanced approach

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

123 cited
  • 2010SJR and SNIP: two new journal metrics in Elsevier's Scopus98 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2013Users beware: implications of database errors when assessing the individual research records of ecologists and conservation biologists14 cited
    • 2019The changing research landscape and reflections on national research assessment in the future12 cited