SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Revising the research record
9 references·1 citing·26 second hop
Revising the research record (1995)Revising the research recordIntegrity and Misconduct in Research (1996)Integrity and Misconduct in R…Integrity and Misconduct in Research (1996)Integrity and Misconduct in R…Misconduct in medical research (1995)Misconduct in medical researchMAST-I: agreeing to disagree (1995)MAST-I: agreeing to disagreeLessons from the Pearce affair: handling scientific fraud (1995)Lessons from the Pearce affai…The Scientific Community's Response to Evidence of Fraudulent Publication (1994)The Scientific Community's Re…Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (1993)Uniform Requirements for Manu…The characteristics of medical retraction notices. (1992)The characteristics of medica…Correcting the Literature Following Fraudulent Publication (1990)Correcting the Literature Fol…How to write a critical letter and respond to one (2001)How to write a critical lette…NLM's practices for handling errata and retractions. (1989)The Continued Use of Retracted, Invalid Scientific Literature (1990)Retractions, press releases and newspaper coverage (2007)An analysis of citations to retracted articles in the scientific literature (2019)Recommendations from the Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science: Shaping a Research and Implementation Agenda Project (2021)Misrepresentation and Responsibility in Medical Research (1987)Analysis of Citations to Biomedical Articles Affected by Scientific Misconduct (2009)The problem of plagiarism (2010)Fate of Articles That Warranted Retraction Due to Ethical Concerns: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study (2014)Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (1991)Fraud, misconduct or normal science in medical research--an empirical study of demarcation. (1999)Lessons from the Darsee Affair (1983)Fraud and Misconduct in Medical Research (1996)Authorship: an ethical dilemma of science (2005)A Review of the Types of Scientific Misconduct in Biomedical Research (2008)Should I include studies from “predatory” journals in a systematic review? Interim guidance for systematic reviewers (2021)Letters to the Editor 1991 (1992)Letters: A Forum for Scientific Discourse (1999)Fraud: retracted articles are still being cited (2000)Linking of errata: Current practices in online physical sciences journals (2003)THE TECHNOLOGICAL OBSOLESCENCE OF SCIENTIFIC FRAUD (1996)Research Misconduct and Crime Lessons from Criminal Science on Preventing Misconduct and Promoting Integrity (2005)Shifts in Guidelines for Ethical Scientific Conduct (2009)Evidence for the effectiveness of peer review (1997)Authorship in a small medical journal: A study of contributorship statements by corresponding authors (2004)Reporting Quality of Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Dental Specialty Journals (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1995Lessons from the Pearce affair: handling scientific fraud75 cited
  • 1990Correcting the Literature Following Fraudulent Publication72 cited
  • 1993Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals71 cited
  • 1994The Scientific Community's Response to Evidence of Fraudulent Publication47 cited
  • 1996Integrity and Misconduct in Research46 cited
  • 1992The characteristics of medical retraction notices.28 cited
  • 1995Misconduct in medical research26 cited
  • 1996Integrity and Misconduct in Research23 cited
  • 1995MAST-I: agreeing to disagree18 cited

Cited by

  • 2001How to write a critical letter and respond to one11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work