SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The quality of reporting of randomized clinical trials published in Ophthalmology · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleThe quality of reporting of randomized clinical trials published in Ophthalmology

Juan Camilo Sánchez-Thorin2001

Article2001

The quality of reporting of randomized clinical trials published in Ophthalmology

Juan Camilo Sánchez-Thorin

52 citations·0/0 files stored·Ophthalmology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Academic Writing and Publishing Academic Publishing and Open Access

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 52 citations exist upstream.

References

1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement 1996The CONSORT Statement 1996Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement 1998Reporting of Randomized Clinical Trial Descriptors and Use of Structured Abstracts

Cited by

2006Quality of Reporting of Randomized, Controlled Trials in Cerebral Palsy 2006Randomised clinical trials in plastic surgery: Survey of output and quality of reporting 2008A systematic review of trends in the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials in various research fields 2003Clinical trials in orthodontics II: assessment of the quality of reporting of clinical trials published in three orthodontic journals between 1989 and 1998 2011Subspecialization of the Ophthalmic Literature 2014The reporting quality of parallel randomised controlled trials in ophthalmic surgery in 2011: a systematic review 2010Reporting randomised clinical trials of analgesics after traumatic or orthopaedic surgery is inadequate: a systematic review 2005The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies published in ophthalmic journals

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

1998Quality of Full and Final Publications Reporting Acute Stroke Trialsreview · 3 shared references 2006Improving the quality of reporting randomized controlled trials in cardiothoracic surgery: The way forwardarticle · 3 shared references 1998Beyond CONSORT: Need for Improved Reporting Standards for Clinical Trialsarticle · 3 shared references 2003Clinical Trials in the Journal of Pediatric Psychology: Applying the CONSORT Statementarticle · 3 shared references 2007Quality of Reporting of Key Methodological Items of Randomized Controlled Trials in Clinical Ophthalmic Journalsarticle · 3 shared references 2006Randomised clinical trials in plastic surgery: Survey of output and quality of reportingarticle · 3 shared references

Details

Year2001

Typearticle

Published2001-02-01

VenueOphthalmology

ISSN-L0161-6420

Languageen

Citations52

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00500-5

openalex_workW2030320337

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.