SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
La production scientifique issue de la formation initiale à la faculté de médecine d’Angers entre 2002 et 2008 : de bonne qualité mais insuffisante
9 references·0 citing·34 second hop
La production scientifique issue de la formation initiale à la faculté de médecine d’Angers entre 2002 et 2008 : de bonne qualité mais insuffisante (2012)La production scientifique issue de la fo…Masters theses from a university medical college: Publication in indexed scientific journals (2010)Masters theses from a univers…Robustesse du score SIGAPS, critère bibliométrique pour valoriser les publications des établissements de santé (2009)Robustesse du score SIGAPS, c…How impact factors changed medical publishing—and science (2007)How impact factors changed me…EMBASE versus MEDLINE for family medicine searches: can MEDLINE searches find the forest or a tree? (2005)EMBASE versus MEDLINE for fam…An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…BARRIERS TO FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION FOLLOWING PRESENTATION OF ABSTRACTS AT ANNUAL ORTHOPAEDIC MEETINGS (2003)BARRIERS TO FULL-TEXT PUBLICA…[The impact factor of medical journals, a bibliometric indicator to be handled with care]. (2002)[The impact factor of medical…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Why the impact factor of jour…Failure to publish research: A form of scientific misconduct? (1996)Failure to publish research: …Fortnightly Review: How can impact factors be improved? (1996)Existe-t-il une corrélation entre le score SIGAPS et les publications en français ? (2012)Modèle de valorisation des publications médicales scientifiques : le logiciel SIGAPS (2014)Importance of Quality Assessment in Clinical Research in Japan (2019)Publishing Opportunities for Nurses: A Comparison of 100 Journals (1982)Publishing Opportunities for Nurses: A Comparison of 92 US. Journals (1991)“Novice Authors … What You Need to Know to Make Writing for Publication Smooth” (2011)Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (1997)Short report: Do presenters to paediatric meetings get their work published? (2000)From idea to publication: Publication rates of theses in neurosurgery from Turkey (2015)Analysis of the publishing rate and the number of citations of general surgery dissertations (2016)A systematic review on academic research productivity of postgraduate students in low- and middle-income countries (2018)Medline and Embase complement each other in literature searches (1998)Searching the right database. A comparison of four databases for psychiatry journals (1999)Identifying Clinical Trials in the Medical Literature with Electronic Databases (2000)Searching Embase and MEDLINE by using only major descriptors or title and abstract fields: a prospective exploratory study (2018)PubMed coverage varied across specialties and over time: a large-scale study of included studies in Cochrane reviews (2019)Using Embase as a supplement to PubMed in Cochrane reviews differed across fields (2021)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers (1990)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Le paradoxe de la « T2A bibliométrique » SIGAPS : un risque d’effet délétère sur la recherche française ? (2008)Characteristics and trends in publication of scientific papers presented at the European Congress of Radiology: a comparison between 2000 and 2010 (2016)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2018)A combined bibliometric indicator to predict article impact (2010)Impact factors, scientometrics and the history of citation-based research (2012)Accounting for Impact? The Journal Impact Factor and the Making of Biomedical Research in the Netherlands (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
  • 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,444 cited
  • 2003BARRIERS TO FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION FOLLOWING PRESENTATION OF ABSTRACTS AT ANNUAL ORTHOPAEDIC MEETINGS286 cited
  • 2007How impact factors changed medical publishing—and science129 cited
  • 2010Masters theses from a university medical college: Publication in indexed scientific journals82 cited
  • 2005EMBASE versus MEDLINE for family medicine searches: can MEDLINE searches find the forest or a tree?72 cited
  • 2002[The impact factor of medical journals, a bibliometric indicator to be handled with care].25 cited
  • 1996Failure to publish research: A form of scientific misconduct?22 cited
  • 2009Robustesse du score SIGAPS, critère bibliométrique pour valoriser les publications des établissements de santé21 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work