Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Evaluation of a clinical test. I: Assessment of reliability

13 references·6 citing·31 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
1986STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT47,910 cited
1989Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use9,594 cited
1968Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.8,719 cited
1973The Equivalence of Weighted Kappa and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as Measures of Reliability3,355 cited
1990High agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxes3,024 cited
1966The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as a Measure of Reliability2,304 cited
2010Health Measurement Scales--A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use1,870 cited
1981Clinical biostatistics: LIV. The biostatistics of concordance1,088 cited
1992Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures.988 cited
1975The Reliability of Clinical Methods, Data and Judgments653 cited
1975Measuring Agreement between Two Judges on the Presence or Absence of a Trait501 cited
1988A rEAPPRAISAL OF THE KAPPA COEFFICIENT500 cited

Cited by

2014True Reproducibility of UltraSound Techniques (TRUST): systematic review of reliability studies in obstetrics and gynecology

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

58 cited

2005Agreement studies in obstetrics and gynaecology: inappropriateness, controversies and consequences49 cited

2009Individual patient data meta-analysis of diagnostic and prognostic studies in obstetrics, gynaecology and reproductive medicine36 cited

2020Pathologists should probably forget about kappa. Percent agreement, diagnostic specificity and related metrics provide more clinically applicable measures of interobserver variability29 cited

2023Integrity of randomized clinical trials: Performance of integrity tests and checklists requires assessment20 cited

2004Evidence‐based obstetric and gynaecologic diagnosis: the STARD checklist for authors, peer‐reviewers and readers of test accuracy studies11 cited