Measuring the habitat as an indicator of socioeconomic position: methodology and its association with hypertension

Bruna Galobardes

28 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Epidemiology & Community Health

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Health disparities and outcomes Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies Public Health and Social Inequalities

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES: (1) to develop an indicator of socioeconomic position based on the social standing of the habitat (SSH), that is, the residential building, its immediate surroundings, and local neighbourhood; (2) to assess the relation of SSH to two usual markers of socioeconomic position (education and occupation) and a known, socially determined health outcome (hypertension). DESIGN: Population survey measuring SSH, detailed educational and occupational histories, and blood pressure. The SSH is a standardised assessment of the external and internal aspects of someone's building (or house), and of the characteristics of its immediate surroundings and local neighbourhood. SETTING: A sample of participants to the Bus Santé survey between 1993 and 1998, in Geneva, Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: 588 men and women, aged 35 to 74. MAIN RESULTS: The SSH index was highly reproducible (kappa=0.8). Concordance of SSH with education or occupation was good for people of either high or low socioeconomic position, but not for those with medium education and/or occupation. There was a higher prevalence of hypertension in the lowest compared with the highest groups, defined on the basis of education or occupation, but the SSH was the only indicator that showed a higher prevalence of hypertension among people in the middle of the social spectrum. CONCLUSIONS: People of medium education or occupation are heterogeneous with respect to their habitat. Those living in habitats of medium social standing may be most affected by hypertension but this association could not be revealed on the basis of education and occupation alone. The habitat seems to capture different aspects of the socioeconomic position compared with the usual indicators of social class.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 28 citations exist upstream.

References

1997Measuring Social Class in US Public Health Research: Concepts, Methodologies, and Guidelines 1992Socioeconomic status and health: how education, income, and occupation contribute to risk factors for cardiovascular disease.2001Investigating Neighborhood and Area Effects on Health 2001Neighborhood of Residence and Incidence of Coronary Heart Disease 1988THE MEASUREMENT OF SOCIAL CLASS IN EPIDEMIOLOGY 1996Inequality in income and mortality in the United States: analysis of mortality and potential pathways 1993Area, Class and Health: Should we be Focusing on Places or People?1996Choosing a future for epidemiology: II. From black box to Chinese boxes and eco-epidemiology.

Cited by

2005Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1): Figure 1 2007Measuring socioeconomic position in health research 2004Housing and Public Health 2007Understanding social disparities in hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control: The role of neighborhood context 2004Measuring neighbourhood social and material context: generation and interpretation of ecological data from routine and non-routine sources

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.