SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Accuracy of gleason grading by practicing pathologists and the impact of education on improving agreement
1 references·2 citing·13 second hop
Accuracy of gleason grading by practicing pathologists and the impact of education on improving agreement (2003)Accuracy of gleason grading by practicing…Interobserver variation in prostate cancer Gleason scoring: Are there implications for the design of clinical trials and treatment strategies? (1997)Interobserver variation in pr…Reducing interrater variability and improving health care: a meta‐analytical review (2011)Reducing interrater variabili…A study of Gleason score interpretation in different groups of UK pathologists; techniques for improving reproducibility (2006)A study of Gleason score inte…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Factorial Surveys: Using Vignettes to Study Professional Judgement (2005)Educational measurement. (2015)Street-level Enforcement Style: A Multidimensional Measurement Instrument (2018)Expert panel diagnosis demonstrated high reproducibility as reference standard in infectious diseases (2019)Assessing Quality in Systematic Literature Reviews: A Study of Novice Rater Training (2020)Assessing Inter-Rater Reliability for Rating Scales: Resolving some Basic Issues (1976)Efforts to improve interobserver agreement in histopathological grading (1995)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. (1971)Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures. (1992)On population‐based measures of agreement for binary classifications (2008)Short- and long-term effects of a training session on pathologists’ performance: the INQAT experience for histological grading in breast cancer (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Interobserver variation in prostate cancer Gleason scoring: Are there implications for the design of clinical trials and treatment strategies?58 cited

Cited by

  • 2006A study of Gleason score interpretation in different groups of UK pathologists; techniques for improving reproducibility49 cited
  • 2011Reducing interrater variability and improving health care: a meta‐analytical review42 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work