The Logic of Simulation in Jury Research

Abstract

For both substantive and methodological reasons, laboratory research into the functioning of mock jurors and juries may not be a useful foundation for the practical understanding of actual jury functioning. Data are provided to demonstrate that changes in the structural verisimilitude ("realism") of a simulated trial can produce systematic changes in juror response. However, the modal verdict in the most realistic simulation was not the verdict in the actual trial upon which the simulation was based. In general, we conclude that researchers should make all efforts to maximize the applicability of their findings by tailoring their methods and means of subject selection more closely to the realities of courtroom practice.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 55 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.