Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

A case study of the arbitrariness of the h-index and the highly-cited-publications indicator

16 references·12 citing·43 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
2008Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact810 cited
2003Characteristics of highly cited papers491 cited
2011The inconsistency of the h‐index344 cited
2006Measures for measures285 cited
2002Benchmarking international scientific excellence: Are highly cited research papers an appropriate frame of reference?251 cited
2011Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents190 cited
2008Generalizing the h- and g-indices164 cited
2009The w‐index: A measure to assess scientific impact by focusing on widely cited papers120 cited
2008A quantitative analysis of indicators of scientific performance97 cited
2008An empirical investigation of the g‐index for 26 physicists in comparison with the h‐index, the A‐index, and the R‐index93 cited
2009The π-index: a new indicator for assessing scientific impact83 cited
2010Twenty Hirsch index variants and other indicators giving more or less preference to highly cited papers65 cited
2009A case study of the modified Hirsch index hm accounting for multiple coauthors60 cited
2011

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

On measuring scholarly influence by citations

52 cited

2010How Does the Market Use Citation Data? The Hirsch Index in Economics48 cited

Cited by

2018A skeptical view on the Hirsch index and its predictive power*20 cited
2020The inconsistency of h-index: A mathematical analysis20 cited
2015Citation Impact Categorization: For Scientific Literature15 cited
2018Research assessment by percentile-based double rank analysis15 cited
2018Technological research in the EU is less efficient than the world average. EU research policy risks Europeans’ future15 cited
2019Probability and expected frequency of breakthroughs: basis and use of a robust method of research assessment14 cited
2013How to derive an advantage from the arbitrariness of the g-index9 cited
2014Weighted Consensus Index for Assessment of The Scientific Performance of Researchers9 cited
2013Do we need the g‐index?9 cited
2023In search of a scientific elite: highly cited researchers (HCR) in France8 cited
2016The construct validity of theh-index8 cited
2020On the influence of uncited publications on a researcher’s h-index8 cited