(Post)development and Post-colonialism: Separated by Common Ground?

Abstract

Rather like in the old ‘debates’ between adherents of modernisation and neo-Marxist theories, the proponents of (post)development and postcolonialism are often thought to be talking past one another rather than with each other. Many official development agencies appear to promote business as usual. Conversely, anti-development and some postdevelopment adherents argue for abandonment of ‘the development project’ in toto, while some postcolonial purists rely on surprisingly modernist, totalising discursive techniques while claiming poststructural credentials, or baulk at the prospects of practical engagement. This article argues for greater productive engagement, examining what has occurred and suggesting ways to take forward the challenges.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 4 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.