SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How well do randomised controlled trials of physical interventions for people with spinal cord injury adhere to the CONSORT guidelines? An analysis of trials published over a 10-year period
14 references·0 citing·42 second hop
How well do randomised controlled trials of physical interventions for people with spinal cord injury adhere to the CONSORT guidelines? An analysis of trials published over a 10-year period (2014)How well do randomised controlled trials …Elevating the Quality of Disability and Rehabilitation Research: Mandatory Use of the Reporting Guidelines (2014)Elevating the Quality of Disa…Poor description of non-pharmacological interventions: analysis of consecutive sample of randomised trials (2013)Poor description of non-pharm…Descriptions of non-pharmacological interventions in clinical trials (2013)Descriptions of non-pharmacol…The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed (2010)The quality of reports of ran…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …Adequacy of Published Oncology Randomized Controlled Trials to Provide Therapeutic Details Needed for Clinical Application (2010)Adequacy of Published Oncolog…Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in General Endocrinology Literature (2008)Quality of Reporting of Rando…CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts (2008)CONSORT for reporting randomi…Quality of Reporting of Key Methodological Items of Randomized Controlled Trials in Clinical Ophthalmic Journals (2007)Quality of Reporting of Key M…Quality of Reporting of Randomized, Controlled Trials in Cerebral Palsy (2006)Quality of Reporting of Rando…Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials Reporting in the Primary Treatment of Brain Tumors (2006)Quality of Randomized Control…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)CONSORT 2010 Statement (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. (2010)Effect of Preventive Interventions in Mentally Ill Parents on the Mental Health of the Offspring: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2011)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): Extending the CONSORT Statement (2010)Impact of Spin in the Abstracts of Articles Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial (2014)Reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomised trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement with explanation and elaboration (2018)Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT): Modified Delphi Study (2016)Enhancing the usability of systematic reviews by improving the consideration and description of interventions (2017)CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials Reporting in the Treatment of Sarcomas (2011)Oncology trial abstracts showed suboptimal improvement in reporting: a comparative before-and-after evaluation using CONSORT for Abstract guidelines (2014)The reporting of progression criteria in protocols of pilot trials designed to assess the feasibility of main trials is insufficient: a meta-epidemiological study (2019)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Requisitos uniformes para manuscritos submetidos a periódicos biomédicos: escrevendo e editando para publicações biomédicas (2006)Eligibility Criteria of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in High-Impact General Medical Journals (2007)Reporting of interventions in randomised trials: an audit of journal Instructions to Authors (2014)Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts among high-impact general medical journals: a review and analysis (2016)On the Reporting of Experimental and Control Therapies in Stroke Rehabilitation Trials: A Systematic Review (2018)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Quality of descriptions of treatments: a review of published randomised controlled trials (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 2010The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed503 cited
  • 2008CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts460 cited
  • 2013Poor description of non-pharmacological interventions: analysis of consecutive sample of randomised trials374 cited
  • 2010Adequacy of Published Oncology Randomized Controlled Trials to Provide Therapeutic Details Needed for Clinical Application102 cited
  • 2006Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials Reporting in the Primary Treatment of Brain Tumors95 cited
  • 2008Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in General Endocrinology Literature87 cited
  • 2007Quality of Reporting of Key Methodological Items of Randomized Controlled Trials in Clinical Ophthalmic Journals61 cited
  • 2014Elevating the Quality of Disability and Rehabilitation Research: Mandatory Use of the Reporting Guidelines61 cited
  • 2006Quality of Reporting of Randomized, Controlled Trials in Cerebral Palsy

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

52 cited
  • 2013Descriptions of non-pharmacological interventions in clinical trials16 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.