SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Systematic reviews: A guide for radiographers and other health care professionals
16 references·1 citing·39 second hop
Systematic reviews: A guide for radiographers and other health care professionals (2010)Systematic reviews: A guide for radiograp…The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for repo…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…Choice of data extraction tools for systematic reviews depends on resources and review complexity (2009)Choice of data extraction too…What is a systematic review? (2008)What is a systematic review?Tips and tricks in performing a systematic review (2008)Tips and tricks in performing…Reading, writing and systematic review (2008)Reading, writing and systemat…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Attention should be given to multiplicity issues in systematic reviews (2008)Attention should be given to …What's in a Number? Issues in Providing Evidence of Impact and Quality of Research(ers) (2006)What's in a Number? Issues in…Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science (2006)Three options for citation tr…The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The History and Meaning of th…Impact factors: use and abuse. (2003)Impact factors: use and abuse.Counting on citations: a flawed way to measure quality (2003)Counting on citations: a flaw…Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions (2002)Hierarchy of evidence: a fram…Systematic reviews of qualitative research (2001)Systematic reviews of qualita…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Why the impact factor of jour…Interventions to reduce anxiety, distress and the need for sedation in adult patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review (2013)Interventions to reduce anxie…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar (2007)Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor (2008)A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science for a typical university (2009)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (2013)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers (1990)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Handbook of qualitative research (1999)Journal impact factor: a brief review. (1999)Coverage and citation impact of oncological journals in the Web of Science and Scopus (2008)The elephant in the living room: or extending the conversation about the politics of evidence (2009)The 100 most cited articles in dentistry (2013)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on. (2006)The aetiological and psychopathological validity of borderline personality disorder in youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2015)Systematic searching for environmental evidence using multiple tools and sources (2017)Cost and effects of integrated care: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis (2020)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Estudos de revisão sistemática: um guia para síntese criteriosa da evidência científica (2007)11 Evidence in Management and Organizational Science: Assembling the Field’s Full Weight of Scientific Knowledge Through Syntheses (2008)Shades of Grey: Guidelines for Working with the Grey Literature in Systematic Reviews for Management and Organizational Studies (2016)How Much Better Are the Most-Prestigious Journals? The Statistics of Academic Publication (2005)Women in interdisciplinary science: Exploring preferences and consequences (2006)Does Sample Size Matter in Qualitative Research?: A Review of Qualitative Interviews in is Research (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration17,627 cited
  • 2006The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor2,765 cited
  • 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,444 cited
  • 2002Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions993 cited
  • 2006Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science751 cited
  • 2003Impact factors: use and abuse.500 cited
  • 2006What's in a Number? Issues in Providing Evidence of Impact and Quality of Research(ers)218 cited
  • 2008Tips and tricks in performing a systematic review203 cited
  • 2003Counting on citations: a flawed way to measure quality166 cited
  • 2008Attention should be given to multiplicity issues in systematic reviews138 cited
  • 2008Reading, writing and systematic review93 cited
  • 2009Choice of data extraction tools for systematic reviews depends on resources and review complexity

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

88 cited
  • 2001Systematic reviews of qualitative research72 cited
  • 2008What is a systematic review?63 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2013Interventions to reduce anxiety, distress and the need for sedation in adult patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review87 cited