SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Comparing preference assessments: Selection- versus duration-based preference assessment procedures
14 references·1 citing·29 second hop
Comparing preference assessments: Selection- versus duration-based preference assessment procedures (2009)Comparing preference assessments: Selecti…THE EFFECTS OF BRIEF AND EXTENDED STIMULUS AVAILABILITY ON PREFERENCE (2007)THE EFFECTS OF BRIEF AND EXTE…RELATIVE VERSUS ABSOLUTE REINFORCEMENT EFFECTS: IMPLICATIONS FOR PREFERENCE ASSESSMENTS (1999)RELATIVE VERSUS ABSOLUTE REIN…EXAMINATION OF AMBIGUOUS STIMULUS PREFERENCES WITH DURATION‐BASED MEASURES (1999)EXAMINATION OF AMBIGUOUS STIM…EVALUATION OF A BRIEF STIMULUS PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT (1998)EVALUATION OF A BRIEF STIMULU…EMERGENCE OF REINFORCER PREFERENCE AS A FUNCTION OF SCHEDULE REQUIREMENTS AND STIMULUS SIMILARITY (1997)EMERGENCE OF REINFORCER PREFE…BASIC AND APPLIED RESEARCH ON CHOICE RESPONDING (1997)BASIC AND APPLIED RESEARCH ON…USING A CHOICE ASSESSMENT TO PREDICT REINFORCER EFFECTIVENESS (1996)USING A CHOICE ASSESSMENT TO …Integrating caregiver report with systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification. (1996)Integrating caregiver report …EVALUATION OF A MULTIPLE‐STIMULUS PRESENTATION FORMAT FOR ASSESSING REINFORCER PREFERENCES (1996)EVALUATION OF A MULTIPLE‐STIM…A COMPARISON OF REINFORCER ASSESSMENT METHODS: THE UTILITY OF VERBAL AND PICTORIAL CHOICE PROCEDURES (1996)A COMPARISON OF REINFORCER AS…TREATMENT OF SELF‐INJURY AND HAND MOUTHING FOLLOWING INCONCLUSIVE FUNCTIONAL ANALYSES (1994)TREATMENT OF SELF‐INJURY AND …Preference testing: A comparison of two presentation methods (1994)Preference testing: A compari…A COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES FOR IDENTIFYING REINFORCERS FOR PERSONS WITH SEVERE AND PROFOUND DISABILITIES (1992)A COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHE…ASSESSMENT OF STIMULUS PREFERENCE AND REINFORCER VALUE WITH PROFOUNDLY RETARDED INDIVIDUALS (1985)ASSESSMENT OF STIMULUS PREFER…Replacement behaviors for identified functions of challenging behaviors (2010)Replacement behaviors for ide…IDENTIFYING REINFORCERS FOR PERSONS WITH PROFOUND HANDICAPS: STAFF OPINION VERSUS SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF PREFERENCES (1988)A review of choice research with people with severe and profound developmental disabilities (1996)AN ANALOGUE EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT: THE ROLE OF STIMULUS PREFERENCE (1997)DISPLACEMENT OF LEISURE REINFORCERS BY FOOD DURING PREFERENCE ASSESSMENTS (1997)Toward a functional analysis of self-injury (1982)REDUCING BEHAVIOR PROBLEMS THROUGH FUNCTIONAL COMMUNICATION TRAINING (1985)A Review of Behavioral Treatments for Self-Injurious Behaviors of Persons With Autism Spectrum Disorders (2007)FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS SCREENING FOR PROBLEM BEHAVIOR MAINTAINED BY AUTOMATIC REINFORCEMENT (2013)SOME CURRENT DIMENSIONS OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS1 (1968)SELF‐STIMULATORY BEHAVIOR AND PERCEPTUAL REINFORCEMENT (1987)BALANCING THE RIGHT TO HABILITATION WITH THE RIGHT TO PERSONAL LIBERTIES: THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES TO EAT TOO MANY DOUGHNUTS AND TAKE A NAP (1990)ON THE LAW OF EFFECT 1 (1970)EVALUATION OF CLIENT PREFERENCE FOR FUNCTION‐BASED TREATMENT PACKAGES (1997)Operant Behavior: Areas of Research and Application, (1966)Problem Behavior Interventions for Young Children with Autism: A Research Synthesis (2002)Science and Human Behavior (1953)RELATIVE AND ABSOLUTE STRENGTH OF RESPONSE AS A FUNCTION OF FREQUENCY OF REINFORCEMENT 1, 2 (1961)TOWARD A FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF SELF‐INJURY (1994)EVALUATING TREATMENT CHALLENGES WITH DIFFERENTIAL REINFORCEMENT OF ALTERNATIVE BEHAVIOR (1999)The Effect of Choice-Making as an Intervention for Problem Behavior (2004)Toward Effective and Preferred Programming: A Case for the Objective Measurement of Social Validity with Recipients of Behavior-Change Programs (2010)TREATMENT OF PICA THROUGH MULTIPLE ANALYSES OF ITS REINFORCING FUNCTIONS (1998)AN EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF MATCHED STIMULI ON BEHAVIORS MAINTAINED BY AUTOMATIC REINFORCEMENT (2000)EVALUATION OF A BRIEF MULTIPLE‐STIMULUS PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT IN A NATURALISTIC CONTEXT (2000)Choice and preference assessment research with people with severe to profound developmental disabilities: a review of the literature (2004)Stereotypy I: A review of behavioral assessment and treatment (2005)EXAMINATION OF RELATIVE REINFORCEMENT EFFECTS OF STIMULI IDENTIFIED THROUGH PRETREATMENT AND DAILY BRIEF PREFERENCE ASSESSMENTS (2001)ON THE APPLIED USE OF PROGRESSIVE‐RATIO SCHEDULES OF REINFORCEMENT (2008)Comparison of the predictive validity and consistency among preference assessment procedures: A review of the literature (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1992A COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES FOR IDENTIFYING REINFORCERS FOR PERSONS WITH SEVERE AND PROFOUND DISABILITIES1,626 cited
  • 1996EVALUATION OF A MULTIPLE‐STIMULUS PRESENTATION FORMAT FOR ASSESSING REINFORCER PREFERENCES1,334 cited
  • 1985ASSESSMENT OF STIMULUS PREFERENCE AND REINFORCER VALUE WITH PROFOUNDLY RETARDED INDIVIDUALS631 cited
  • 1998EVALUATION OF A BRIEF STIMULUS PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT470 cited
  • 1996Integrating caregiver report with systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification.335 cited
  • 1996USING A CHOICE ASSESSMENT TO PREDICT REINFORCER EFFECTIVENESS237 cited
  • 1994TREATMENT OF SELF‐INJURY AND HAND MOUTHING FOLLOWING INCONCLUSIVE FUNCTIONAL ANALYSES237 cited
  • 1997BASIC AND APPLIED RESEARCH ON CHOICE RESPONDING236 cited
  • 1994Preference testing: A comparison of two presentation methods171 cited
  • 1999RELATIVE VERSUS ABSOLUTE REINFORCEMENT EFFECTS: IMPLICATIONS FOR PREFERENCE ASSESSMENTS146 cited
  • 1996A COMPARISON OF REINFORCER ASSESSMENT METHODS: THE UTILITY OF VERBAL AND PICTORIAL CHOICE PROCEDURES136 cited
  • 1999EXAMINATION OF AMBIGUOUS STIMULUS PREFERENCES WITH DURATION‐BASED MEASURES89 cited
  • 1997EMERGENCE OF REINFORCER PREFERENCE AS A FUNCTION OF SCHEDULE REQUIREMENTS AND STIMULUS SIMILARITY84 cited
  • 2007THE EFFECTS OF BRIEF AND EXTENDED STIMULUS AVAILABILITY ON PREFERENCE

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

39 cited

Cited by

  • 2010Replacement behaviors for identified functions of challenging behaviors29 cited