Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

How reliable are forensic evaluations of legal sanity?

9 references·1 citing·44 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1981Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior.2,252 cited
1981Coefficient Kappa: Some Uses, Misuses, and Alternatives1,575 cited
2006A Survey of Psychological Test Use Patterns Among Forensic Psychologists515 cited
2009Rater (dis)agreement on risk assessment measures in sexually violent predator proceedings: Evidence of adversarial allegiance in forensic evaluation?203 cited
1994Demythologizing inaccurate perceptions of the insanity defense.156 cited
2007Does interrater (dis)agreement on Psychopathy Checklist scores in sexually violent predator trials suggest partisan allegiance in forensic evaluations?151 cited
1998Logic and reliability of evaluations of competence to stand trial.124 cited
2008Do some evaluators report consistently higher or lower PCL-R scores than others? Findings from a statewide sample of sexually violent predator evaluations.116 cited
1989Bias and expert testimony of mental health professionals in adversarial proceedings: A preliminary investigation54 cited

Cited by

2020Expert Reliability in Legal Proceedings: “Eeny, Meeny, Miny, Moe, With Which Expert Should We Go?”12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work