SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
An improved risk graph approach for determination of safety integrity levels (SILs)
1 references·10 citing·36 second hop
An improved risk graph approach for determination of safety integrity levels (SILs) (2006)An improved risk graph approach for deter…Safety Integrity Level Selection: Systematic Methods Including Layer of Protection Analysis (2002)Safety Integrity Level Select…A risk‐based fuzzy arithmetic model to determine safety integrity levels considering individual and societal risks (2024)A risk‐based fuzzy arithmetic…Method for Selecting the Safety Integrity Level for the Control-Command and Signaling Functions (2019)Method for Selecting the Safe…An alternative approach to safety integrity level determination: results from a case study (2019)An alternative approach to sa…Application of Industrial Risk Management Practices to Control Natural Hazards, Facilitating Risk Communication (2018)Application of Industrial Ris…RETRACTED ARTICLE: An extension of the fuzzy improved risk graph and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process for determination of chemical complex safety integrity levels (2017)RETRACTED ARTICLE: An extensi…Study on risk assessment of chemical process based on an advanced layers of protection analysis method (2016)Study on risk assessment of c…The use of risk matrices and risk graphs for SIL determination (2013)The use of risk matrices and …Risk tolerance criteria and the IEC 61511/ISA 84 standard on safety instrumented systems (2013)Risk tolerance criteria and t…3-Parameters SPW technique: A new method for evaluation of target safety integrity level (2013)3-Parameters SPW technique: A…Fuzzy Risk Graph Model for Determining Safety Integrity Level (2008)Fuzzy Risk Graph Model for De…Introduction to layers of protection analysis (2003)Developments in SIL determination (2005)The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—II (1975)Fuzzy assessment of FMEA for engine systems (2002)Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning (2003)Uncertainty analysis for target SIL determination in the offshore industry (2015)What's Wrong with Hazard‐Ranking Systems? An Expository Note (2009)Choosing appropriate quantitative safety risk criteria: Applications from the new CCPS guidelines (2010)Using risk tolerance criteria to determine safety integrity levels for safety instrumented functions (2012)Risk Assessment of Micro Energy Grid Protection Layers (2017)Of Acceptable Risk: Science and the Determination of Safety (1976)On the invalidity of fuzzifying numerical judgments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process (2007)Quantitative assessment of domino and NaTech scenarios in complex industrial areas (2013)Simplified risk assessment on fire hazard of LPG filling station (2017)Fuzzy hierarchical analysis (1985)Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP (1996)Fuzzy sets (1996)A perceptual computing–based method to prioritize intervention actions in the probabilistic risk assessment techniques (2019)Acquiring and Sharing Tacit Knowledge in Failure Diagnosis Analysis Using Intuitionistic and Pythagorean Assessments (2019)Ignorance‐aware safety and reliability analysis: A heuristic approach (2019)The Role of the Affect and Availability Heuristics in Risk Communication (2006)ISO 31000:2009—Setting a New Standard for Risk Management (2010)The Risk Perception Paradox—Implications for Governance and Communication of Natural Hazards (2012)Fuzzy sets (1965)Systematic failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) using fuzzy linguistic modelling (2005)Analyzing system safety and risks under uncertainty using a bow-tie diagram: An innovative approach (2011)Verification of the IEC 61508 PFH formula for 2oo3 configuration using Markov chains and Petri nets (2020)A decision loop for situation risk assessment under uncertainty: A case study of a gas facility (2021)Hazard analysis techniques for system safetyOn how to define, understand and describe risk (2010)The risk concept—historical and recent development trends (2011)Overcoming challenges in using layers of protection analysis (LOPA) to determine safety integrity levels (SILs) (2017)A mathematical optimization model for determining safety integrity levels in process facilities (2023)Layer of Protection Analysis – Quantifying human performance in initiating events and independent protection layers (2012)Layers of protection analysis in the framework of possibility theory (2013)The application of Bayesian – Layer of Protection Analysis method for risk assessment of critical subsea gas compression systems (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2002Safety Integrity Level Selection: Systematic Methods Including Layer of Protection Analysis42 cited

Cited by

  • 2008Fuzzy Risk Graph Model for Determining Safety Integrity Level23 cited
  • 2017RETRACTED ARTICLE: An extension of the fuzzy improved risk graph and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process for determination of chemical complex safety integrity levels23 cited
  • 2013The use of risk matrices and risk graphs for SIL determination17 cited
  • 2018Application of Industrial Risk Management Practices to Control Natural Hazards, Facilitating Risk Communication13 cited
  • 2013Risk tolerance criteria and the IEC 61511/ISA 84 standard on safety instrumented systems8 cited
  • 2016Study on risk assessment of chemical process based on an advanced layers of protection analysis method8 cited
  • 2019An alternative approach to safety integrity level determination: results from a case study7 cited
  • 2019Method for Selecting the Safety Integrity Level for the Control-Command and Signaling Functions7 cited
  • 20133-Parameters SPW technique: A new method for evaluation of target safety integrity level7 cited
  • 2024A risk‐based fuzzy arithmetic model to determine safety integrity levels considering individual and societal risks6 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work