SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Factors Affecting Subjective Estimates of Magnitude: When is 9 > 221?
1 references·3 citing·13 second hop
Factors Affecting Subjective Estimates of Magnitude: When is 9 > 221? (2001)Factors Affecting Subjective Estimates of…How to show that 9 > 221: Collect judgments in a between-subjects design. (1999)How to show that 9 > 221: Col…Illusory inconsistencies in judgment: Stimulus-evoked reference sets and between-subjects designs (2019)Illusory inconsistencies in j…Comparing the Perceived Size of 9 with 221 and with 2143: Biasing Effects of Inferred Context in a Between-Subjects Design (2013)Comparing the Perceived Size …Exploring a Counterintuitive Finding with Methodological Implications Why is 9 > 221 in a Between-subjects Design? (2012)Exploring a Counterintuitive …On the psychology of prediction. (1973)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. (1984)Ambiguity and Self-Evaluation: The Role of Idiosyncratic Trait Definitions in Self-Serving Assessments of Ability (2002)Human Research and Data Collection via the Internet (2004)Experimental Vignette Studies in Survey Research (2010)In defense of external invalidity. (1983)The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic (2006)Within-subjects designs: To use or not to use? (1976)Research Methods, Design, and Analysis (2010)Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. (1986)The Affect Heuristic (2002)International Journal of Humanities and Social Science (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1999How to show that 9 > 221: Collect judgments in a between-subjects design.229 cited

Cited by

  • 2013Comparing the Perceived Size of 9 with 221 and with 2143: Biasing Effects of Inferred Context in a Between-Subjects Design3 cited
  • 2012Exploring a Counterintuitive Finding with Methodological Implications Why is 9 > 221 in a Between-subjects Design?3 cited
  • 2019Illusory inconsistencies in judgment: Stimulus-evoked reference sets and between-subjects designs3 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work